Search for: "parts-76" Results 81 - 100 of 3,436
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Feb 2024, 7:42 am by Howard Friedman
In awarding petitioner, who had been sentenced to three years in prison for violating the law, damages of 6000 Euros, plus costs and expenses, the court said in part:75.... [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 10:30 pm by David Fåhraeus
Last, as will be discussed further on, the Bronner criteria, and in particular indispensability, are not part of the legal test for self-preferencing (para 81). [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit reversed in part, holding that the plaintiffs pled adequately that Macquire made affirmative misstatements in the form of “half-truths” that required disclosure, and that Macquarie violated Item 303. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by Norman L. Eisen
We all agree that it would be better, assuming the allegations are true in whole or in part, if Willis and Wade had avoided this situation entirely. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 4:06 am by Rob Robinson
This financial aid, part of the European Peace Fund, signifies the EU’s steadfast support for Ukraine and its sovereignty. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 8:12 am
 Pix Credit Museum Panama City, Panama For those who might have an interest, I have posted for comment or reaction, a discussion draft of my essay, Overcoming the Human, Rights, and the State in Human Rights. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 11:47 am by Jason Rantanen
Joes Identified in Schedule A, No. 1:23-cv-02605 (SDNY Jan. 2, 2024), ECF 76. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 10:30 pm by Maria Grazia Porcedda
These, as supplemented by recitals 74, 76 and 83, provide criteria for the appropriateness of TOMs, which must be assessed concretely, having regard to the needs and risks of processing (paras 30-36). [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 1:10 am by INFORRM
” In July 2023, the High Court ruled part of the article carried defamatory meaning, in part because it could have been read as alleging Harry “was responsible for trying to mislead and confuse the public as to the true position, which was ironic given that he now held a public role in tackling ‘misinformation,’” The Duke of Sussex v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2022] EWHC 1755 (QB). [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm by admin
“Know then thyself, presume not God to scan; The proper study of Mankind is Man. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 7:24 am by Dennis Dimka
A gentle reminder as part of the follow-up process after acknowledging their review is painless and enough to get the ball rolling. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
”For his part, Trump is now responding in kind and calling Biden a threat to democracy. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 12:55 pm by Maria Hook
As a matter of statutory interpretation, the Court of Appeal considered that “[o]n its face the Act applies, and there is no good reason to read it more narrowly” (at [76]). [read post]