Search for: "v. Attorney General of Michigan et al" Results 81 - 100 of 172
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Mar 2008, 10:54 am
For publication opinions today (4): In Sally Gibbs, et al v. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 1:42 pm
Jerry Ryce Masonry, Inc., et al., the State of Illinois brings an action under the new Employee Classification Act (820 ILCS 185/1), a recent act that we wrote about here. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am by Bernard Bell
The Case and the Decision After his appointment as City Manager for Port Huron, Michigan, James Freed expanded the use of his “public” Facebook page to post about not only personal matters but also about matters related to his public office. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 6:01 am by Timothy P. Flynn
Attorney in the case of United States v Samuel Mullet, et al, charged members of a peculiar Amish synod with hate crimes; charges that involve far more complex proofs.About two-years ago, ole Samuel Mullet [you cannot make it up] broke away from the traditional fundamentalist Christian Amish church in which he was raised, to start a renegade sect of his own in Bergholz, Ohio. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 5:01 am by Russell Wheeler
Dominion et al (April 2021) and later assessed significant attorneys’ fees.) [read post]
1 Jul 2007, 11:06 pm
Miller, et al    Eastern District of Michigan at DetroitCOBRA; EQUITABLE ESTOPPELBOGGS, Chief Judge. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 3:36 am by John Day
Page Keeton et al., [Prosser and Keeton on the Law of Torts] § 121, at 897 (5th ed. 1984)). [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 4:30 am
Calls seeking comment to the Indiana Attorney General's Office were not returned._______ *1:05-cv-00735-JDT-TAB BAUDE et al v. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:20 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
In § 6, I discuss an important recent study by Kimberly Rauscher ScD, MA, et al. , entitled “Prevalence of Workplace Violence Against Young Workers in the United States,” published in the American Journal of Industrial Medicine , Volume 66, Issue 6 [pp. 462-471]. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 11:50 am by William Ford
In light of Zuckerberg’s admission during congressional testimony that the company has a responsibility to use its tools for good, and his acknowledgement that “terrorist propaganda” constitutes “clearly bad activity,” the attorney seeks an order voiding Garaufis’s prior decision and reviving the case—Force et al. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 4:46 pm
American Express Co., et al., No. [read post]