Search for: "v. Department Of Defense"
Results 81 - 100
of 11,031
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Nov 2010, 12:16 pm
And the separation pay rule is an internal Department of Defense policy that the Administration can change on its own, without Congress. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 2:41 pm
Blesch et al v. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 4:10 am
Providing for the defense and indemnification of employees being sued as a result of the performance, or failure to perform, their official dutiesMatter of Matyas v Board of Educ., Chenango Forks Cent. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 6:03 pm
Co. v. [read post]
Federal DC Judge Enjoins Small Business Affirmative Action Program as Applied to Military Simulators
17 Aug 2012, 11:24 am
United States Department of Defense, Judge Emmet G. [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 3:00 am
The Appellate Division, First Department's holding in Cherry v. [read post]
23 Nov 2008, 2:04 pm
FAILURE TO STATE CAUSE OF ACTION DEFENSE - CPLR RULE 3211(A)(7) - AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES Butler v. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 4:23 am
Law is now appearing more frequently in legal malpractice cases, mostly as a defense to statute of limitations arguments. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 5:00 pm
Per 13A-12-211, any unlawful distribution of a controlled substance of Schedules I through V is considered a Class B felony. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 12:16 pm
On June 29, 2023, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) released its second report[1] on Department of Defense (DoD) artificial intelligence (AI) acquisition efforts. [read post]
19 Oct 2012, 11:12 am
Health and Human Services Department. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 9:47 am
Probably his most significant loss in a case he argued before the Court came in Shelby County v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 3:51 am
In Chewy v. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 8:31 am
--Court: Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth DistrictOpinion Date: 12/9/09Cite: Central Texas Orthopedic Products, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 9:42 am
Recently, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, in Minarsky v. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 1:46 pm
The department made it clear that they will provide legal defensive help when it is appropriate and necessary. [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 7:04 pm
Dist.), brief by Department of Justice supporting motion to dismiss, file 10/13/09Bishop v. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
However, in its December 5, 2013 opinion in Venecia V. v August V., the Appellate Division, First Department, held that no malpractice had been committed, and no hearing was required to reach that conclusion. [read post]
7 Oct 2021, 8:00 am
Civil litigation — Order of default — Statute of limitations defense In this appeal from a civil action in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, Charlene McCormick, appellant, challenges the court’s failure to enter an order of default against the Housing Authority of Baltimore City (“HABC”), and the court’s granting of HABC’s motion to dismiss. ... [read post]
20 Sep 2018, 4:16 pm
Herrod, the Fourth Department reminds us of the process and standards to be applied in Batson challenges. [read post]
