Search for: "v. HOFFMAN et al" Results 81 - 100 of 170
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 May 2022, 1:48 pm by Mary Whisner
Either way, you might like to have some resources handy to help you understand the context of the case.Good Overviews  Laurie Sobel et al., Abortion at SCOTUS: Dobbs v. [read post]
6 May 2010, 7:38 am by Charles Kotuby
The second pending case is Morrison, et al., v. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 8:00 am by Robert Kreisman
Karounos Brain Damaged Child Receives $7.75 Million Settlement – Louis Montes, a minor, et al. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 12:34 am
| EPO BoA plays better in 10 men | Maps and databases in C-490/14 Verlag Esterbauer | Yoga and copyright | Reid Hoffman and networks | The Lyrica patent dispute | TPP backlash.Never Too Late 70 [week ending on Sunday 1 November] –  Case T-309/13 Enosi Mastichoparagogon Chiou v OHIM, Gaba International Holding GmbH | Sixteen millions IPKats | Tomaydo-Tomahhdo LLC v George Vozray et al | Lookalike… [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 2:40 pm
 Never Too Late 70 [week ending on Sunday 1 November] –  Case T-309/13 Enosi Mastichoparagogon Chiou v OHIM, Gaba International Holding GmbH | Sixteen millions IPKats | Tomaydo-Tomahhdo LLC v George Vozray et al | Lookalike packaging | Parasite copying | 3D printing | Labouring the point? [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 10:44 am
Indiana State Dept. of Administration and/or the Div. of Disability, Aging and Rehabilative Services, Silvia Funk, et al (NFP) Michael Page v. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 11:05 pm
Cases here: http://www.bankruptcylitigationblog.com/uploads/file/KeyMadoff546Cases-SDNY-2010-11.pdf … B-SDNY: Picard's common law non-fraud claims ag insiders for failure to supervise, etc, not preempted by NY Martin Act. http://www.bankruptcylitigationblog.com/uploads/file/PicardvsMadoffs-BK-SDNY-Lifland-9-22-11.pdf … B-SDNY: Wagoner & in pari delicto rules dont apply to insiders so Picard has standing sue them for common law fraud.… [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 5:24 am
Century City Apartments Property Services CC and Another v Century City Property Owners Association (Afro-IP)   Spain A branding miracle from: from bullring to shop windows (Class 46)   Ukraine Ukrainian Higher Economic Court denies Ferrero’s claim on Raffaello trade mark infringement: Group Ferrero v Landrin (Class 46)   United Kingdom EWHC on compensation for employee inventors whose patents are particularly beneficial to employers: Shanks v… [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 9:28 am by Elim
LAW LIBRARY level 3: KD632.S428 A3 2017Desmond de Silva et al., Madam, Where Are Your Mangoes? [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 9:28 am by Elim
LAW LIBRARY level 3: KD632.S428 A3 2017Desmond de Silva et al., Madam, Where Are Your Mangoes? [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 7:37 am by ESTHER NEVILLE CASTRO
The 2016 Hoffman v L&M Arts case is a notable example of the delicate balance between personal privacy and the required transparency in the art market. [7] The main focal point of the case is the well-known Mark Rothko painting, called “Red Rothko” formerly owned by Marguerite Hoffman, the plaintiff. [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 10:15 am
Mauro Chavez, M.D., et al., a 5-page opinion on rehearing, Judge Robb writes:In Adams v. [read post]