Search for: ". OD" Results 981 - 1000 of 1,532
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
This decision deals with an appeal against the decision of the Opposition Division (OD) to revoke a patent belonging to the MS Development (“MS”) company. [read post]
3 May 2011, 1:37 pm by Glenn Reynolds
” Meanwhile, reader Michael Od writes: “Can we nominate the president for another Nobel peace prize? [read post]
1 May 2011, 10:03 pm by Jim Chen
From the very beginning, this blog has celebrated ordinary places, ordinary things, and ordinary events. [read post]
1 May 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
The present decision deals with an appeal filed by several opponents after the Opposition Division (OD) had maintained the opposed patent in amended form.Claim 1 as granted read:Use of at least one dye, which dye is capable of staining tissue without diffusing through said tissue, for the manufacture of a staining composition for visualizing a lens capsule in an eye during performance of a capsulorhexis.NB: Capsulorhexis is a technique used to remove the lens capsule during cataract… [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 3:00 pm by Federal and Extradition Defense
The two suspects, Alwar Pouryan, 36, and Oded Orbach, 52, were arrested in Bucharest in February and remained in the custody of Romanian authorities until their extradition today, U.S. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
It is just a waste of time because the OD may be expected to decide as it did before, except that it will provide some reasons why the OPs are not held in Munich (which should not be too difficult). [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
The patent proprietor filed an appeal against the decision of the Opposition Division (OD) to revoke the patent for lack of novelty over document D3.Claim 1 of the main request before the Board read:Use of metal complexes of an azo compound which conforms to the formula (I) or to one of its tautomeric structureswhereR and R’ are independently OH, NH2, NH-CN, acylamino or arylamino andR1 and R1’ are independently -OH or -NH2,and which hosts at least one guest compound, the metal… [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 6:00 am by The Dear Rich Staff
”Hand continued with a statement familiar to most students of copyright:"If by some magic a man who had never known it were to compose anew Keats's Ode on a Grecian Urn, he would be an "author," and, if he copyrighted it, others might not copy that poem, though they might of course copy Keats's. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 9:53 am by Elie Mystal
We’ve done a lot of stories about alleged thievery at law schools and law firms, and we’ve posted many funny messages from the victims of these crimes looking to get their stuff back. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
This decision deals with the revocation of the opposed patent by the Opposition Division (OD).Claim 1 as filed readA method of cooling animals, such as cows, whereby a liquid is applied between the hairs and/or on the skin of the animal, whereupon air is blown over the liquid.Claim 1 as granted read:A method of cooling animals, such as cows, whereby a liquid is applied between the hairs and/or on the skin of the animal, and wherein air is blown over the liquid, characterized in that, after… [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 6:31 pm by Glenn Reynolds
BATTLESPACE PREPARATION: Donald Trump: Obama Is To Blame For High Gas Prices. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Thus the OD would have acted ultra vires if it had corrected the grant decision. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Consider a situation where a patent is maintained in amended form by the Opposition Division (OD). [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
The waiting period to be kept by the OD only depends on these requirements. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
This decision deals with the revocation of a patent - owned by XIRING - by the Opposition Division (OD) and the subsequent appeal, filed on behalf of Gemalto SA (hereinafter referred to as “alleged appellant”). [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Genigeorgis stated before the OD (point II, above), the same difficulties arise. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
In the present case, the patent proprietor and three of the four opponents filed appeals against the decision of the Opposition Division (OD) to maintain the patent in amended form.The decision is somewhat lengthy; if you are happy with a summary, here is a translation of the headnotes provided by the Board:1. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Well, perhaps not.The present case deals with an opposition that had been rejected by the Opposition Division (OD). [read post]