Search for: "AMENDMENT TO RULES FOR MANAGEMENT OF COURT FUND" Results 981 - 1000 of 2,644
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Nov 2018, 4:03 pm by Wolfgang Demino
Knowingly receiving third-party records will do for sponsoring records under the judicially-amended Houston-Texas version of the business records rule; knowledge of the recordkeeping process of the originating entities no longer required. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 8:12 pm by David Jacobson
02: Meeting chairman’s powers 02: Super fund related party acquisitions 02: Queensland civil courts changes from 1 November 02: No conflicts for Governor-General August 2010 (9) 22: Paid parental leave update 22: Personal property securities administration 22: ASIC guide on unsolicited credit cards 18: Electronic signature allowed for elector enrolment 17: Personal property securities register fees 17: Privacy of your pizza information … [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 8:34 pm by Joe Virene
Chapters 2267 and 2269 of the Government Code will be amended to allow a governmental entity to require a design-build firm responding to an RFP to identify companies that will: (1) fill key project roles, including project management, lead design firm, quality control management, and quality assurance management; (2) serve as key task leaders for geotechnical, hydraulics and hydrology, structural, environmental, utility, and right-of-way issues. [read post]
12 Nov 2017, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
  It is seeking funding via the Crowd Justice site. [read post]
12 May 2014, 4:49 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
In Windsor, the Supreme Court ruled unconstitutional  the prohibition enacted by Congress, which prohibited the federal government from recognizing marriages or domestic partnerships between same-sex couples that were valid under state law for purposes of federal tax laws. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 8:36 am by azatty
Supreme Court’s historic ruling in District of Columbia v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 4:20 am
”While the court recently altered its rules, the amendments still do not define what constitutes a sufficiently specific request for reparations.On this question as well, the report recommends that the ECCC look to the example of the Inter-American Court; specifically, to its judgment in “Mapiripàn Massacre” v. [read post]
21 May 2010, 4:38 am by James Hamilton
States will have responsibility for regulating advisers with less than $100,000,000 in assets under management. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 5:00 am by familoo
The FLBA invites the Government to amend the Bill to ensure that public funds are made available (subject to eligibility) for legal advice and representation for all parties in all cases where: The child has been joined as a party (whether under Rule 16 or otherwise); The court is considering making findings of harm/abuse (whether to adult or child). [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 3:08 am by Peter Mahler
The Court’s Decision Permitting Leave to Amend The defendants raised a number of arguments in opposition to the plaintiffs’ motion for leave to amend. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 6:58 am
 The district court eventually granted in part and denied in part the long-pending motion to dismiss, and also gave Krinsk leave to file an amended complaint. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 12:33 pm
In the case, Maine state employees argued that using service fees for national union litigation violated their 1st Amendment right of free association by requiring them to fund lawsuits that they didn’t believe were right. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:24 pm
Texas, which the Court decided in 2003, and the vulnerability inherent in interpersonal relations under the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 7:28 am by Jim Eisenmann
As the Supreme Court has said, the Framers of the U.S. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 12:48 pm by Eugene Volokh
Plaintiffs' novel First Amendment claims are a step removed from the typical kind. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 3:49 pm by Kedar Bhatia
Ball State University 11-556Issue: Whether the “supervisor” liability rule established by Faragher v. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 4:43 am by Edith Roberts
Pauley, the upcoming Supreme Court case involving “the legacy of the controversial Blaine amendments, which many states use to restrict public financial aid to religious-affiliated institutions. [read post]