Search for: "Bayer v. Bayer"
Results 981 - 1000
of 1,122
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2009, 10:45 pm
Failure to Function/Non-distinctiveness:TTAB Finds Religious Habit Not Registrable: Lacks Distinctiveness, Inherent or AcquiredFamous Marks Doctrine:Precedential No. 17: TTAB Dismisses Bayer "FLANAX" Cancellation Claims - No Famous Marks Exception in US LawFraud:Precedential No. 23: TTAB Refuses to Hear Belated Fraud Claim, Finding It Not Tried By ConsentPrecedential No. 21: TTAB Sustains "PALOMA" 2(d) Opposition to "PALOMITA" for Clothing, But Dismisses Claim… [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 9:20 am
Category: Recent Decisions Body: Bayer v. [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 7:56 am
., et al. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 4:29 am
In Heisner v. [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 5:28 am
D'Este v. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 9:46 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Eloxatin (Oxaliplatin) – US: District Court New Jersey grants summary judgment of non-infringement in favour of Hospira, Teva and others concerning patent relating to Sanofi’s Eloxatin: Sanofi-Aventis v Sandoz (SmartBrief) (The IP Factor) (GenericsWeb) (Patents4Life) General Europe’s ever changing landscape… [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 12:24 pm
Viktor V. [read post]
14 Jun 2009, 10:49 pm
Bayer. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 12:10 pm
Trade Comm’n v. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 10:49 am
Brief in opposition of respondents Bayer AG and Bayer Corp Petitioner's reply Brief amici curiae of 54 Intellectual Property Law, Economics, and Business Professors (in support of petitioners) Docket: 08-1223 Title: Maxwell-Jolly v. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 9:40 pm
" Bayer AG v. [read post]
22 May 2009, 5:25 am
In Bayer v. [read post]
14 May 2009, 3:35 pm
Bayer Corp. and Pastor v. [read post]
13 May 2009, 4:11 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
12 May 2009, 6:51 pm
., et al. v. [read post]
8 May 2009, 10:00 am
: Warner Bros v V G Santosh (Spicy IP) Where do we go? [read post]
8 May 2009, 8:39 am
One of these cases, D’Este v. [read post]
6 May 2009, 10:06 pm
On May 5, 2009, in D'Este v. [read post]
6 May 2009, 6:13 pm
In D’Este v. [read post]
5 May 2009, 8:11 pm
Otherwise, this case could provide needed guidance in this area of wage and hour law.The case is D'Este v. [read post]
