Search for: "Block v. State" Results 981 - 1000 of 9,509
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Oct 2014, 6:22 pm by Lyle Denniston
Texas put the new law into use in three state elections, doing so initially soon after the Supreme Court in its 2013 decision in Shelby County v. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 4:59 pm
On June 10, 2009, the Supreme Court issued  its opinion in People v. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 8:34 am by Ben
In the space of under a week there have been two big cases in the JUSA looking at web blocking - and with differing results. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 2:11 pm
On October 31, 2007, Judge Cacheris of the Eastern District of Virginia held court in the case of Tafas v. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 7:13 am by Samuel Bray
The context of the case is immigration law: three states (Arizona, Montana, and Ohio) had sued to obtain an injunction blocking the Department of Homeland Security from implementing a memorandum about enforcement priorities. [read post]
29 Jul 2021, 6:18 am by James Romoser
Here’s the Thursday morning read: Maine church asks Supreme Court to block state from enforcing Covid restrictions due to Delta (Ariane de Vogue, CNN) Roe v. [read post]
4 May 2010, 11:41 am by lawmrh
There are already traffic laws against blocking or impeding traffic on state streets and highways. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 10:58 am by Paul R. Recupero
Hovland blocked the WOTUS Rule from going into effect in the 24 states that have challenged the legality of the Rule in West Virginia et al. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 10:58 am by Paul R. Recupero
Hovland blocked the WOTUS Rule from going into effect in the 24 states that have challenged the legality of the Rule in West Virginia et al. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 10:58 am by Paul R. Recupero
Hovland blocked the WOTUS Rule from going into effect in the 24 states that have challenged the legality of the Rule in West Virginia et al. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 7:59 am by Barbara S. Mishkin
  The company seeking the injunction in John Doe Company v. [read post]