Search for: "Booker v. State" Results 981 - 1000 of 1,086
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Apr 2018, 12:23 pm by Quinta Jurecic
Cory Booker) and the “Special Counsel Integrity Act” (sponsored by Thom Tillis and Democratic Sen. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 6:11 am
., writes: The right to have one's lawyer speak (and speak, and speak . . .) at sentencing has been given some lifeblood in United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2008, 2:05 pm
Blackmun had only a few years earlier been propelled from obscurity when he wrote the court's 7-to-2 majority opinion in Roe v. [read post]
15 Apr 2007, 9:21 pm
(Of note, in that Term, the Court impressively managed to decide United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2008, 1:56 pm
Blackmun had only a few years earlier been propelled from obscurity when he wrote the court's 7-to-2 majority opinion in Roe v. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 3:25 am by Russ Bensing
  The 3rd Circuit affirmed that in 2008, but last week the Supreme Court vacated that decision and remanded the case for reconsideration in light of Smith v. [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 1:12 am by Bill Otis
 Then, as now, he concealed the defendant's name (calling the case "US v. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 2:15 pm
Reproductive rights Barr did not distance himself from his past assertion that Roe v. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 10:47 am by Jon Levitan
Harris and Booker, as members of the Judiciary Committee, have an opportunity to produce a viral soundbite in hearings. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 3:49 pm
Pruitt, No. 06-6002 Given the particular characteristics of North Carolina sentencing law, in light of recent United States Supreme Court precedent, in determining whether to apply the career offender provision of the United States Sentencing Guidelines, a federal court must take into account the defendant's state criminal history (or lack thereof) at the time of his predicate North Carolina convictions. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 12:28 pm by Susan Klein
That system lasted until 2005, when the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]