Search for: "Branch v. State"
Results 981 - 1000
of 6,950
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Aug 2018, 2:18 pm
To read the Texas lawsuit, State of Texas, et al. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2015, 7:26 am
This is reminiscent of Plaut v. [read post]
31 Jan 2007, 10:40 am
Rather than defend the indefensible, the Executive Branch moved to dismiss our suit on the basis of the “state secrets privilege ” - the very same defense that Alberto Gonzales ’s deputies have invoked to fend off the ACLU ’s challenges to illegal NSA eavesdropping and CIA kidnapping, and to silence FBI whistleblower Sibel Edmonds. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 3:32 am
This time it's the United States District Court for the District of Kansas ordering summary judgment for the United States on March 10, 2009 in an interpleader action styled Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v Carrie R. [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 1:13 pm
Reiterman v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 4:17 am
State v. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 2:12 pm
Jarkesy, Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
12 Aug 2012, 10:24 pm
” Summit Petroleum Corp. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 3:39 pm
Origin and Meaning of the Anti-Power-Concentration Principle In Seila Law v. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 2:41 am
It is not often that a court allows reargument, states that it misapplied the law, and reverses itself as took place in Orlando v Robinson Brog Leinwand Greene Genovese & Gluck, P.C. [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 2:40 pm
Moreover, at least three important precedents--United States v. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 8:21 am
Last term, in RJR Nabisco, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 3:00 am
The case of the day is Tiffany (NJ) LLC v. [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 9:01 pm
Indeed, it has happened before.In the 1992 case of Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 7:24 am
The court also cited a United States Supreme Court case, Arthur v. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 8:07 am
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)Story County (Iowa) District Court Judge Dale Ruigh last week ruled in Beef Products Inc. et al. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 3:03 pm
The signs and banners outside the Supreme Court today referred to the right to marry but the argument in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 11:53 am
So reminds the Second Department, Appellate Division: The Supreme Court should have granted that branch of the appellant's motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the plaintiffs' third cause of action insofar as asserted against it for failure to state a cause of action (see Light v Light, 64 AD3d 633). [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 2:04 pm
(Eugene Volokh) The case is United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 9:59 am
In the majority opinion in Murthy v. [read post]
