Search for: "Brennan v. Brennan"
Results 981 - 1000
of 1,730
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2017, 2:11 am
Brennan, U.S. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 1:12 am
Brennan v. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 12:25 pm
Yet today, its historic decision in Gideon v. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 5:01 am
Maryland and Giglio v. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 5:04 pm
(Brennan v Modern Chevrolet Co. (1972)). [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 5:03 pm
“The net effect of sobriety checkpoints on traffic safety is infinitesimal and possibly negative,” wrote Justices Paul Stevens, William Brennan and Thurgood Marshall in their Michigan v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 12:27 pm
The ruling in Evans v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 10:52 am
Synder v. [read post]
7 May 2008, 10:48 am
In 1987, in McCleskey v. [read post]
26 Jul 2016, 1:30 pm
— This commentary was broadcast on WAMC Northeast Report, July 26, 2016. [1] See generally the Brennan Center for material on public financing. [2] Arizona Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 3:30 am
The result is a terrifically lucid and engaging account, filled with telling details—notably including Professor Nelson’s recounting, based on both published opinions and internal correspondence, of the doctrinal duel between Justice Douglas and Justice Brennan over the framework for standing in Data Processing and its companion case Barlow v. [read post]
26 Dec 2024, 7:52 am
Justice William Brennan D. [read post]
29 May 2007, 1:14 pm
S., at 395 (opinion of Brennan, J.). [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 7:31 am
Behrend and Wal-Mart v. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 8:15 am
McIntyre Machinery Ltd. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 7:30 am
Calandra, 414 U.S. 338, 357 (1974) (Brennan, J., dissenting). [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 11:15 am
McIntyre Machinery Ltd. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
§1257 under Michigan v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 12:24 pm
Justices Brennan and Marshall thought the death penalty was cruel and unusual per se for different reasons. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 6:05 am
The Brennan Center for Justice’s Sidney Rosdeitcher and Katriana Roh preview the arguments presented in the case. [read post]
