Search for: "Bullet v. State"
Results 981 - 1000
of 1,412
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2014, 10:47 am
Hernandez v. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 6:43 pm
Will the citizen (and resident alien, really) v noncitizen distinction continue to apply; and will the territorial v nonterritorial distinction continue to apply in counterterroism legal regimes? [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 6:05 am
From State v. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 5:03 pm
Suppose the bullet penetrates two different muscle groups; are those separate claims? [read post]
16 Jan 2010, 8:50 am
A proposal by Belgium and other states to add several weapons crimes (including employing poison weapons, asphyxiating gases, and expanding bullets) to the provisions addressing non-international armed conflicts. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 5:21 am
U.S. v. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 2:44 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 Jan 2024, 5:01 am
Young v. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 9:01 pm
In a 1985 case, Winston v. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 8:27 pm
While Chief Justice Roberts' NFIB v. [read post]
11 Sep 2020, 12:13 am
” Calvary Chapel Dayton Valley v. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 4:30 am
The rise of strict liability occasioned by Judge Traynor’s decision in Greenman v. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 9:19 am
They are permitted in the UK (but we do not see them often), and in other EU Member States, such as Sweden, where this case originated, as well as elsewhere (such as in the US). [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 2:57 pm
Cruz-Diaz, No. 07-1534, 07-1535 Armed bank-robbery convictions are affirmed, despite one bank teller's doubt as to whether the gun was real, where eyewitness testimony, the bank's surveillance video, and the discovery of a bullet casing in the getaway car were all consistent with the finding that the gun was real. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 6:48 am
Klinger v. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 4:00 am
A 9mm bullet blows the lung out of the body. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 1:09 pm
You betcha.In state after state, whether product liability is common-law or statutory, and whether it’s based on the Second or Third Restatement, courts have refused to allow plaintiffs to make claims asserting that legal products should not have been sold at all. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 3:04 pm
That is the issue before the United States Supreme Court in Elonis v. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 10:56 pm
There is rarely a magic bullet solution when trying to find an answer. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 3:03 pm
State. [read post]
