Search for: "CH"
Results 981 - 1000
of 8,972
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2014, 4:10 am
Two interesting points arose in British Shorinji Kempo Federation v Shorinji Kempo Unity [2014] EWHC 285 (Ch) (17 Feb 2014) in which my colleague Thomas Dillon appeared for the British Shorinji Kempo Foundation ("BSKF") on a pro bono basis. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 4:53 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Raggett v Society of Jesus Trust of 1929 for Roman Catholic Purposes & Anor [2010] EWCA Civ 1002 (27 August 2010) High Court (Chancery Division) HM Revenue and Customs v Marks and Spencer Plc [2010] EWHC 2215 (Ch) (27 August 2010) Source: www.bailii.org [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 1:35 am
In re Frontsouth (Witham) Ltd (in administration) and Bridge Hospital (Witham) Ltd (in administration) [2011] EWHC 1668 (Ch); [2011] WLR (D) 215 “Rule 7.55 of the Insolvency Rules 1986 could not be used by the court to waive defects of a relatively technical nature in the out of court appointment of administrators and such a change should only be brought about by legislation. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
Ch.; 2/24), Chancellor McCormick refused to dismiss a plaintiff’s claims that the Activision Blizzard board of directors “violated multiple provisions of the Delaware General Corporation Law (the “DGCL”) governing board negotiation and board and stockholder approval of merger agreements” when it authorized the company’s merger agreement […] [read post]
20 Nov 2024, 3:00 am
Ch.; 10/24), the Chancery Court refused to dismiss fiduciary duty claims against a SPAC sponsor and other insiders arising out of alleged misrepresentations concerning the value of the SPAC’s shares in a de-SPAC proxy statement. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 2:00 am
Ch; 12/21), which touched on the issue of when, under the terms of a merger agreement, a former target stockholder is no longer a “stockholder” for purposes of asserting a books & records claim. [read post]
11 Feb 2024, 9:58 pm
There are some odd comments in the judgment in Lifestyle Equities CV & Anor v Royal County of Berkshire Polo Club Limited & Ors [2023] EWHC 2923 (Ch) : “The Defendants … say the Claimants accepted the Defendants’ incurred costs were reasonable in the Precedent R. [read post]
13 Jun 2021, 5:50 am
Author The Lud Licence Copyright waiver Jane LambertChancery Division (Lord Justice Warby) Duchess of Sussex v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2021] EWHC 1245 (Ch) (12 May 2021)At a directions hearing before Lord Justice Warby on 5 May 2021, His Lordship granted summary judgment to the Duchess of Cambridge in her claim for copyright infringement against the publisher of The Mail on Sunday and The Mail [read post]
14 Mar 2022, 9:00 pm
Ch.; 2/22), in which Vice Chancellor Laster determined to apply an upward adjustment to the merger consideration in determining the fair value of a share. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 2:07 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Charisma, R. v [2009] EWCA Crim 2345 (13 October 2009) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Leo Pharma (a/s Leo Laboratories Ltd) v Sandoz Ltd [2009] EWCA Civ 1188 (17 November 2009) High Court (Chancery Division) Thin Cap Group Litigation, Test Claimants In v Revenue and Customs [2009] EWHC 2908 (Ch) (17 November 2009) Sheikh [...] [read post]
13 Sep 2024, 9:50 am
Author J.P.Lon-Commonswiki Public Domain Source Wikimedia CommonsJane LambertChancery Division (Tom Mitcheson KC) Foundation for the Protection of the Traditional Cheese of Cyprus Named Halloumi v Fontana Food Ab [2024] EWHC 2311 (Ch) (9 Sept 2024)In Geographical Indications, I wrote that signs that are used on products that have a specific geographical origin and [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 10:03 am
Author Scott Foresman Jane Lambert Chancery Division (Mr Justice Arnold) Freshasia Foods Ltd v Jing Lu [2019] EWHC 638 (Ch) 20 March 2019 This was a claim by an employer against its former employee for breach of a restrictive covenant in his contract of employment, breach of confidence and infringement of copyright and database right. [read post]
4 Sep 2018, 6:03 am
The Rolls Building Author Basher Eyre Licence Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 2.0 generic Source Wikipedia Jane Lambert Chancery Division (Master Clark) Massimo Osti SRL v Global Design and Innovation Ltd and another [2018] EWHC 2263 (Ch) (30 Aug 2018) This was an application by the claimant to set aside an order made by the court on its own initiative under [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 8:12 am
Community Health Systems update: As previously reported, CHS was hacked. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 3:50 am
Jane Lambert Chancery Division (Mrs Justice Joanna Smith) Getty Images (US) Inc and others v Stability AI Ltd [2023] EWHC 3090 (Ch) (1 Dec 2023)The defendant company, Stability AI Ltd., offers to create images to its customers' specifications using a type of artificial intelligence known as "stable diffusion". [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 3:00 am
Ch.; 2/22), the Delaware Chancery Court rejected a hostile bidder’s allegations its nominees for election to the board were valid under the company’s advance notice bylaw or that the board acted inequitably in rejecting those nominations. [read post]
5 Feb 2025, 2:00 am
Ch.; 2/24) — denying a motion to dismiss a lawsuit against TripAdvisor’s board and controlling stockholder. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 2:23 am
EDO Corpn v Ultra Electronics Ltd [2009] EWHC 682 (Ch); [2009] WLR (D) 114 “The procedure for pre-action disclosure provided by s 33(2) of the Supreme Act 1981 was not available to a party where the underlying dispute he might have with the proposed defendant arose out of a contract which required any dispute to be [...] [read post]
27 Nov 2009, 2:16 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Cornwall v R. [2009] EWCA Crim 2458 (26 November 2009) High Court (Chancery Division) Gemstar-Tv Guide International Inc & Ors v Virgin Media Ltd & Anor [2009] EWHC 3068 (Ch) (26 November 2009) High Court (Queen's Bench Division) Threlfall v Hull City Council [2009] EWHC 3042 (QB) (26 November 2009) IRT Oil and Gas Ltd v [...] [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 3:26 am
C v D and another [2010] EWHC 2940 (Ch); [2010] WLR (D) 292 “A time-limited offer was not capable of being an offer within the meaning of CPR Pt 36, which established that an offer must be capable of acceptance unless and until withdrawn by service of a notice within CPR r 36.9(2). [read post]
