Search for: "CWA"
Results 981 - 1000
of 1,060
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Aug 2008, 7:46 pm
From the bargaining front lines (via the Daily Labor Report): Negotiators for the Communications Workers of America and the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Aug. 10 reached tentative agreement with Verizon Communications Inc. on a three-year contract to cover 65,000... [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 6:56 pm
For claimed contributions of more than $500 but not more than $5,000, the donor must obtain a CWA and must file a completed Form 8283 (Section A) with the return on which the deduction is claimed. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 1:42 am
Thereafter, the district court awarded attorney fees to the Center as the prevailing party under the CWA and the ESA. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 1:07 pm
The maximum penalty for a misdemeanor violation of the CWA is $200,000.00 or twice the gross gain or loss caused by the offense. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 12:11 am
Second, the EPA argued that the CWA authorized the EPA to promulgate Section 122.3(a), or that at least the statute is ambiguous. [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 3:27 pm
In the aftermath of Phillip Morris USA v. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 7:17 pm
” Specifically, the appeal argues that the Fifth Circuit read the Rapanos decision as applying the CWA to any wetlands that merely are neighbors to branches of navigable waters. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 8:26 pm
On the CWA preemption issue, the Court held that there is no congressional intent in the CWA to occupy the field of pollution remedies. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 1:26 pm
On the CWA preemption issue, the Court held that there is no congressional intent in the CWA to occupy the field of pollution remedies. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 7:02 pm
There is no clear indication of congressional intent to occupy the entire field of pollution remedies, nor is it likely that punitive damages for private harms will have any frustrating effect on the CWA's remedial scheme. 3. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 11:00 pm
It also dealt a swift blow to the issue of pre-emption by the CWA, finding “. . . it hard to conclude that a statute geared to protecting “water” “shorelines” and “natural resources” was intended to eliminate sub silento oil companies common law duties to refrain from injuring the bodies and livelihoods of private individuals. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 3:30 pm
All in all, we see no clear indication of congressional intent to occupy the entire field of pollution remedies; nor for that matter do we perceive that punitive damages for private harms will have any frustrating effect on the CWA remedial scheme, which would point to preemption.Slip op. at 15 (citations and footnote omitted). [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 2:20 pm
The Ninth Circuit found EPA’s rule, which was a codification of a recent exemption added to the Clean Water Act (CWA or the Act), to be an impermissible interpretation of the Act. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 7:20 am
The Ninth Circuit found EPA’s rule, which was a codification of a recent exemption added to the Clean Water Act (CWA or the Act), to be an impermissible interpretation of the Act. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 4:32 am
Subsequently, the state issued a CZMA and CWA Section 401 certification in February 2008. [read post]
18 Jun 2008, 1:18 am
In May 2005, Sierra Properties applied for a Clean Water Act (“CWA”) permit pursuant to CWA section 404 for the CCTC… on May 15, 2007, the Corps issued an Environmental Assessment finding that CCTC would not cause unacceptable environmental impacts and issued the requested section 404 permit allowing development of CCTC to proceed. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 10:59 am
ECO argues that the common law doctrine of res judicata cannot be applied to CWA citizen suits, and there is some precedent to that effect. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 12:14 am
ECO argues that the common law doctrine of res judicata cannot be applied to CWA citizen suits, and there is some precedent to that effect. [read post]
1 Jun 2008, 5:31 pm
402(b) of the CWA, it follows that a transfer of . . . permitting authority does not trigger ? [read post]
29 May 2008, 3:19 am
ECO argues that the common law doctrine of res judicata cannot be applied to CWA citizen suits, and there is some precedent to that effect. [read post]
