Search for: "Cable v. State"
Results 981 - 1000
of 1,821
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Feb 2014, 2:00 pm
” It “provides too wide a discretion to the Secretary of State in respect of the categories and kinds of documents” that may be collected, for instance in allowing her to “order the interception of all material passing along a transatlantic cable. [read post]
1 Feb 2014, 7:00 pm
In NFL v. [read post]
1 Feb 2014, 6:43 pm
In NFL v. [read post]
1 Feb 2014, 6:43 pm
In NFL v. [read post]
1 Feb 2014, 7:39 am
The 1966, Texas Supreme Court case styled, Williams v. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 5:46 am
As Wikipedia notes, “Title III of the Act set rules for obtaining wiretap orders in the United States. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 10:59 am
I have a hard time seeing how mass taps on sea cables in the TEMPORA program can be justified. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 5:16 am
Peter Turdin, Jr. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 11:04 am
Yesterday, Paul posted on Lawfare about the Supreme Court’s decision in Air Wisconsin v. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 5:00 am
In Graham v. [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 7:20 am
The clause was introduced against a backdrop of expanding cable networks and was accompanied by a licensing scheme for retransmission via cable. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 12:19 pm
But not the United States. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 12:19 pm
In its 2010 decision in Comcast Corp. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 9:57 am
As widely reported and commented upon, in Verizon v. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 8:53 am
Ray Haluch Gravel Co. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 2:39 pm
The Court’s decision in Verizon v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 9:48 am
San Juan Cable LLC, No. 11-2135 (D.P.R. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 8:38 am
Compare Bland v. [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 9:00 am
Neither snow nor rain nor heat nor gloom of night – and certainly not a batch of freezing rain and ice that’s currently paralyzing the greater Baltimore-Washington area right now – stays your trusty editors from the swift completion of their appointed rounds; namely, bringing you the weekly roundup of Suits by Suits: It may not make the headlines on cable news channels, but next Tuesday, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in United States v. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 6:43 am
When the cable splicer is confined to a job site during lunch, the CBA states that the cable splicer “will be permitted reasonable paid time to eat on the job. [read post]
