Search for: "California v. Jones"
Results 981 - 1000
of 1,312
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2010, 3:52 am
Fung (IPblog) US Copyright – Decisions Court of Appeal for the 5th Circuit: You can't claim ‘innocence’ of musical copyrights: Maverick Recording Company v Whitney Harper (Ars Technica) District Court Massachusetts: Tenenbaum and Nesson ordered to pay labels’ fees over discovery dispute; court finds ‘no extenuating circumstances’: Sony BMG v Tenenbaum (Copyright & Campaigns) (Ars Technics) District Court N D California:… [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:07 pm
The Panopticon Blog has covered the case of Stunt v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2018] EWCA Civ 1780. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 10:07 am
BrownDocket: 10-224Issue(s): (1) Did the Ninth Circuit err in holding that a “presumption against preemption” requires a “narrow interpretation” of the Federal Meat Inspection Act's express preemption provision, in conflict with this Court's decision in Jones v. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 4:25 pm
Peacock’s solicitors, Hodge, Jones & Allen have released a statement here. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 12:04 pm
Jones, 520 U. [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 8:32 pm
Ex parte Shelton Denoria Jones, WR-62,589-04, (Tex. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 10:12 am
City and County of San Francisco, California, 20-1212, concerns when a takings claim becomes ripe for review. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 6:41 am
Whether the rational basis standard of review should be used to evaluate DOMA is also before Judge Barbara Jones of the Southern District of New York in Windsor v. [read post]
21 Oct 2018, 4:59 pm
Rulings 03252-18 Armanazi v The Sunday Times, 1 (accuracy), 2 (privacy), 9 (reporting of crime) 03565-18 McGurk v scottishdailystar.co.uk, 1 (accuracy), 2 (privacy), 3 (harassment), 4 (intrusion into grief or shock), 6 (children) 04140-18 A Woman v Sunday Mirror, 2 (privacy) and 9 (reporting of crime) 04141-18 A Woman v Mail Online, 2 (privacy) and 9 (reporting of crime) 04737-18 Jones v Epsom Guardian, 1 (accuracy), 4 (intrusion into grief or… [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 4:58 pm
Because both AT&T v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 8:52 am
However, in 2012, the Court decided in United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 11:25 am
In my previous blog entry, I posted my proposal for amendments to the Indian Child Welfare Act. [read post]
24 Mar 2019, 5:08 pm
Schwartz, University of California, Berkeley – School of Law. [read post]
10 Mar 2019, 5:08 pm
The Volokh Conspiracy has a post on the decision in Molinaro v Molinaro – in which the California Court of Appeal reversed an order prohibiting a party from posting anything about the case on Facebook. [read post]
26 Mar 2023, 1:47 pm
Jones that “[o]ur freedoms to engage in various activities also include the freedom not to do so. [read post]
13 May 2019, 6:20 am
Jones . . . and regarding cell phone searches incident to arrest in Riley v. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 8:15 am
Gore Business and the environment Business cycles Business ethics Butterfly cable California Democratic Party v Jones calls for amendment calls for convention Campaign finance Canada Capital gains Capitalism capitalism Carbon certificates Carbon tax Cars census Center for Disease Control Character character & circumstance character of people charity Charles de Gaulle Chemical weapons Childhood Arrivals China China … [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 12:31 pm
California Teachers Association. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 8:30 am
Jones, the Supreme Court held that there was specific jurisdiction in California over non-resident defendants who published an allegedly libelous article about a California resident. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 7:43 am
The case involves salaries for the Fresno County, California, school system, which sets employees’ current salaries by considering their prior salaries. [read post]
