Search for: "Chambers v. State" Results 981 - 1000 of 4,823
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Aug 2009, 3:35 am
Michigan Chambers of Commerce (the case upholding limits on corporate spending in candidate elections). [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 4:15 am by INFORRM
Article 10: The right to receive information Mr Sugar argued that he had the right to disclosure of the Report under Article 10 ECHR which he said recent Strasbourg case law made clear recognised a right of access to information (referring specifically to Matky v Czech Republic, Tarsasag v Hungary and Kenedi v Hungary). [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 5:05 pm by Lyle Denniston
Bica, and a decision by the Justices just last Term, Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 7:30 am by Conor McEvily
United States and Dorsey v. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 12:46 am by CAJ
Obrey v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2013] EWCA Civ 1584 concerns an appeal against an Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) decision which set aside the findings of the First-tier Tribunal (Social Security and Child Support) that Reg. 7(17), Housing Benefit Regulations 2006, breached Art. 14 ECHR (although not expressly set out in the Judgment, presumably in conjunction with A1P1). [read post]
16 Mar 2008, 4:00 pm
Chertoff (06-1717), involving the rate at which paralegal services should be compensated for prevailing parties awarded attorneys’ fees, and Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 1:30 am by Blog Editorial
Eadie QC: yes. 15.20 Eadie QC submits that Parliament set up a legislative scheme under the 1972 Act by way that actions by the UK Government and those of other member states flow back to affect member states. [read post]
6 May 2008, 5:47 pm
When it injected poison into the veins of William Earl Lynd, the state of Georgia restarted the machinery of death, which came to a halt as states awaited a decision in Baze v. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
Proceedings for ancillary relief were traditionally held ‘in chambers’, meaning that no-one apart from the parties or their representatives could attend. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 2:01 pm by Kent Scheidegger
Here's an interesting development in the case of United States v. [read post]
22 Mar 2020, 5:12 pm by INFORRM
Solicitors firms and barristers chambers are switching to remote working. 5RB closed its physical operations on 18 March 2020,  Matrix Chambers is operating with reduced hours and most staff and members working from home. [read post]