Search for: "Clark v. State"
Results 981 - 1000
of 3,498
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Apr 2015, 4:00 am
From SSRN:Tadeusz Kugler, State-Sponsored Religion as Impediment To Assimilation and Immigration: A Look at Europe, (In Narratives and Negotiation: Agency, Religion and the State, edited by Autumn Quezada-Grant and Sargon Donabed. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 6:50 pm
(Foreman & Clark Corp. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 5:00 am
In the case of Clark v. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 6:56 am
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)The United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit this week in Harney v. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 6:42 am
Clark v. [read post]
9 Oct 2009, 12:44 pm
State v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 4:37 pm
The investigating body sent a confidential Letter of Request to a foreign state seeking information and documents relating to him. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 5:36 am
People v. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 6:33 am
State, involving (as stated by the LCJ story) "a Clark County drug case [where] the Indiana Supreme Court will consider whether state courts must pay for translators to assist criminal defendants who don't understand English," Dionne Waugh of the Fort Wayne Journal Gazette writes today on how the situation is handled in Allen County:Allen County uses foreign language interpreters daily in its court systems. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 7:40 pm
” If a juror’s statements during voir dire raise a doubt about his impartiality, such as statements that he has a pre-formed opinion about the case, that juror cannot be permitted to sit unless he states unequivocally that he can be fair and decide the case solely on the evidence adduced at trial (People v Johnson, 17 NY3d 752, 753 [2011]; People v Chambers, 97 NY2d 417, 419 [2002]; People v Arnold, 96 NY2d 358, 362-363 [2001]; People v… [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 2:30 am
In delivering the lead judgment Lord Clarke stated that the critical question in this case of unjust enrichment was whether the appellant was enriched by the banks expense. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 2:13 am
Lords Phillips and Clarke find that the claim falls within the scope of the State Immunity Act 1978, s 3(1)(a). [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 2:57 pm
” Like Clark v. [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 9:36 am
The case is Appling v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 3:22 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Penfold v R [2012] EWCA Crim 1222 (01 June 2012) Gilbert v R [2012] EWCA Crim 1221 (01 June 2012) Saunders v R [2012] EWCA Crim 1185 (01 June 2012) Sandhu v R [2012] EWCA Crim 1187 (01 June 2012) Clark & Anor v R [2012] EWCA Crim 1220 (01 June 2012) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) B (A Child), Re [2012] EWCA Civ 737 (31 May 2012) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Bento v The Chief… [read post]
22 Aug 2019, 9:30 pm
Article V tells us that we can amend the Constitution by calling a national convention to propose changes, and then ratifying those proposals in state conventions. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 3:26 pm
[State v. [read post]
1 Oct 2023, 3:03 pm
In a 1984 decision called Jarvis Clark Co. v. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 8:20 am
Clark International v. [read post]
4 Aug 2013, 6:43 am
Clarke, 2013 U.S. [read post]
