Search for: "Company Doe v. Public Citizen"
Results 981 - 1000
of 1,992
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jul 2017, 3:37 pm
The Court held that the Interstate Commerce Commission Termination Act of 1995 (“ICCTA”; 49 U.S.C., § 10101 et seq.) does not exempt the application of CEQA to a railroad project undertaken by a state public entity, defendant North Coast Railroad Authority (NCRA), on a rail line also owned by that entity. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 12:48 pm
” From The Guardian: “Wilbur Ross denied on Monday that he had done anything wrong after revelations from the Paradise Papers that he has significant investments in a shipping company that does business with Vladmir Putin’s son-in-law and his sanctioned inner circle. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 2:30 pm
” Abdo and others also cite Davison v. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 10:38 am
Sawyer (1952) (President’s attempt to seize control of steel companies during Korean war), and United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm
Trump is finding out.Then why does Mr. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 8:55 am
But the mere possibility that interception of the communication is technologically feasible does not render public a communication that is otherwise private. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 1:06 pm
In September and October 2015, both defendants applied for a declaration that the English court does not have jurisdiction to hear the claims. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 4:05 pm
The Unruly of Law has more on the facts and the film company’s defence. [read post]
21 Mar 2020, 9:45 am
Several nongovernmental organizations challenged the constitutionality of the regulations in the Israeli High Court of Justice, which issued an interim order in Ben Meir v. [read post]
15 May 2012, 5:43 pm
Rhode Island Assoc. of Realtors v. [read post]
13 May 2022, 2:19 pm
" Similarly, the stay-at-home order sought to "preserve the public health and safety, and to ensure the healthcare system is capable of serving all citizens in need. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 9:00 am
See Nader v. [read post]
22 May 2020, 6:00 am
As NSO Group notes in its reply brief, Republic of Philippines v. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 4:40 pm
It also internationalised the qualified privilege protection previously afforded to meetings of UK listed public companies to apply to listed companies worldwide, and extended qualified privilege to cover summaries of (as well as copies of/extracts from) various documents circulated to members of listed companies by the board, directors, auditors or other members. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 10:37 pm
company at issue here. [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 9:03 pm
The case of Elane Photography v. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 11:15 am
Here’s the abstract (paragraph breaks added; h/t Danny Sokol’s Antitrust & Competition Policy Blog): This Article addresses itself to two of the most significant political moments in the last decade: the Supreme Court decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
30 Nov 2018, 12:30 pm
Dissent: In Bluman v. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 9:28 am
Strickler v. [read post]
