Search for: "Connors v. United States" Results 981 - 1000 of 1,234
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jan 2008, 3:48 pm
Wade, it will set off tectonic shifts in the American political landscape not seen since the civil-rights movement‹or perhaps even the Civil War [www.theatlantic.com]     Prophetic Justice By Amy Waldman October 2006 The United States is now prosecuting suspected terrorists on the basis of their intentions, not just their actions. [read post]
10 Mar 2019, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
United States The Cyberlaw Clinic reports that it has filed an amicus curiae brief (.pdf) in the United States Supreme Court in Oracle v. [read post]
25 Feb 2007, 10:35 pm
Indeed, Justice O'Connor described a similar habeas process, distinct from the Due Process Clause, in Hamdi v. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
  In the United States at the end of the millennium, even liberals with gay friends viewed the social group through the lens of sexuality. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:33 am by Fiona de Londras
Possible relevance for Ireland Our Housing Act 1966 bears striking resemblance to the 1996 Act in the UK, especially inasmuch as a District Court judge is required (“shall”, s. 62; Dublin Corporation v. [read post]
28 Jan 2023, 4:00 pm
              In 1984, the United States Supreme Court decided a case called Graham v. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 4:00 am by jonathanturley
A new challenge to the Ninth Circuit test could redefine the key meaning of “waters of the United States. [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 3:49 am by SHG
Perhaps about 2% of attorneys in the United States fit the self-imposed requirement. [read post]
19 May 2022, 6:03 am by Kevin Kaufman
After one year, sales in the state had dropped by 24 percent, but 90 percent of that decline in sales merely represented purchases shifting to neighboring states. [read post]
24 Apr 2016, 9:39 am by Guest Blogger
Indeed, reliance on intermediate scrutiny to do the work of the more traditional tests is manifest in such cases as United States v. [read post]