Search for: "Desper v. State"
Results 981 - 1000
of 1,145
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2011, 9:00 pm
He wrote the amicus curiae briefs for the cruise industry in the case of Carnival v. [read post]
11 Jun 2021, 4:04 am
Even the definition, based on the Supreme Court’s test in Davis v. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 12:07 am
She also sounded a bit desperate on the phone. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 9:59 am
See, for example, Campbell v. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 6:30 am
Will he lead the “transformation” that the United States desperately needs? [read post]
7 May 2009, 12:22 pm
In Van Devent v. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm
The people who have enjoyed the free ride provided by the realization requirement are, however, unsurprisingly annoyed by the possibility that they might have to pay taxes like the little people do, so they are starting to complain.Even so, an excellent explainer in Tuesday’s New York Times ends with this: The problem may be in the Constitution, which gives Congress broad powers to impose taxes, but says “direct taxes”—a term without clear definition—should be… [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm
The people who have enjoyed the free ride provided by the realization requirement are, however, unsurprisingly annoyed by the possibility that they might have to pay taxes like the little people do, so they are starting to complain.Even so, an excellent explainer in Tuesday’s New York Times ends with this: The problem may be in the Constitution, which gives Congress broad powers to impose taxes, but says “direct taxes”—a term without clear definition—should be… [read post]
20 May 2014, 6:08 am
Transformations presents an elaborate account of the ways in which the Reconstruction Congress ordered the military governments of the South to ram the Fourteenth Amendment through state legislatures of the former Confederacy – playing fast and loose with the rules and principles of Article five in an increasingly desperate effort to gain a semblance of “ratification” before the voters would have a chance to return to the polls in 1868. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 7:23 am
Now he's asking if states can define what constitutes death. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 2:30 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 4:30 am
United States, 217 U.S. 349 (1910), a cruel and unusual punishment case. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 1:01 am
But cases which run their full course, and in which plaintiffs refuse to be silenced, are extremely revealing of nefarious but clearly quite routine national newspaper practices: for example, the largely unreported phone-hacking case Gulati and others v MGN Ltd (2015), and Max Mosley’s action against the News of the World in 2008, which saw the paper desperately dreaming up ever more threadbare and ludicrous ‘public interest’ defences to put before a distinctly… [read post]
31 Dec 2008, 10:05 pm
Lawyers, desperate for business, will experiment with auctioning their services on eBay. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 5:06 pm
Where does irradiation of food fit into this evolving continuum including the new rule in the United States for lettuce and spinach? [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 6:00 am
” Kohn and Sanjour battled the EPA for four years, and on May 30, 1995, in a case that impacted every government employee, the United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit, in William Sanjour et al., Appellants, v. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 5:06 pm
Where does irradiation of food fit into this evolving continuum including the new rule in the United States for lettuce and spinach? [read post]
14 Nov 2020, 2:05 pm
Dep’t of Human Resources Development v. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 3:13 pm
(snip)The industry’s pursuit of regulation on its own terms began in Maine in 2007.Sharon Anglin Treat, a lawyer and state legislator, had proposed a bill making clear that lawsuit lenders were subject to state consumer protection laws. [read post]
26 Nov 2015, 6:19 am
Fiona kicked of proceedings with a presentation explaining that many artistes were facing desperate times because streaming was considered (at least by the major record labels) to be a 'making available' right and so no 'Equitable Remuneration' would apply - which of course it would IF streaming was considered a form of broadcasting - a communication to the public. [read post]
