Search for: "Distinctive Brands, Inc."
Results 981 - 1000
of 1,243
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Nov 2008, 3:57 am
Let the names begin (Intellectual Property Watch) EPO, JPO, USPTO, SIPO and KIPO agree on work sharing initiative (IAM) (Patent Librarian’s Notebook) (Managing Intellectual Property) (IPR-Helpdesk) Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants future work to include global policy challenges (Intellectual Property Watch) End of life for IP (Securing Innovation) Royalty monetization: high-profile deals generate excitement among TTOs (Technology Transfer Tactics) Indentifying valuable… [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(Spicy IP) Design v copyright: need for a clear and rational distinction: Microfibres v Giridhar & Co & Ors (Spicy IP) Madras High Court: jurisdiction - can design infringement case can be filed in Court where plaintiff resides? [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 10:47 am
” Harley-Davidson, Inc., supra, 164 F [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 3:30 am
Sakowitz, Inc., 514 F. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 7:55 pm
RADACK ROBOSIGNER REDUX: Chief of one of many courts of appeal in Texas takes swipe at 2017 CFPB enforcement action against Transworld Systems, Inc. [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 10:33 am
Amazon.com, Inc. and Kelly v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 8:25 pm
Courts in the Fourth Circuit examine the following set of factors to aid them in determining the likelihood of confusion: the strength or distinctiveness of the plaintiff’s mark as actually used in the marketplace; the similarity of the two marks to consumers; the similarity of the goods or services that the marks identify; the similarity of the facilities used by the markholders; the similarity of advertising used by the markholders; the defendant’s intent; actual… [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 11:01 pm
DOLLAR PARK AND FLY, INC., 469 U.S. 189 (1985). [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 10:00 pm
,Local ‘Fair copyright for Canada Facebook' groups take off: (Michael Geist),Federal Court of Appeal quashes Copyright Board's proposed iPod levy: (Ars Technica),DMCA used to sue over bad movie review: (Michael Geist),A new copyright pledge for MPs: (Michael Geist),Press coverage of copyright debate: (Michael Geist), (Michael Geist), (Michael Geist),Michael Geist's fair copyright for… [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC: In re Comiskey rehearing en banc falls two votes short; important dissent by Moore J (Hal Wegner) (Inventive Step) (Patently-O) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Law360) (Patent Prospector) District Court Delaware: Document shredding voids 12 Rambus patents: Rambus v Micron Technology (Law360) (Ars… [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 12:29 am
Finally, Sky argued that Starbucks had not shown substantial goodwill in the UK and that third party brands already used the word ‘NOW’; therefore there was no risk of confusion. [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 7:57 pm
Undersection 1052(f), unless a mark is proven to be functional "nothing...shall prevent the registration of a mark used by the application which has become distinctive of the applicant's goods in commerce. [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 11:01 pm
After a successful 11 years, in 1947, its name changed to the International Association of Milk and Food Sanitarians, Inc. [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 9:33 am
In that case, Perfumebay.com, Inc. v. eBay, Inc., - - - F.3d - - - (9th Cir. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 10:17 am
Punchgini, Inc. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 11:05 am
jovický Budvar, národní podnik v Anheuser-Busch, Inc. [read post]
7 Jul 2007, 1:29 am
Phan found this out the hard way - she was imitated by another brand, Angel Sales Inc., and their product BraBaby, trademarked in 2005. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 4:09 am
Varsity Brands, which involves the use of copyright to protect functional objects. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 5:58 am
See Amchem Products, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 6:37 pm
” The lower court relied too heavily on the Second Circuit’s decision in Tiffany (NJ) Inc. v. eBay Inc., which rejected a contributory infringement claim against the Internet auction site based on use of the TIFFANY’S trademark by jewelry counterfeiters on the site. [read post]
