Search for: "Doe Defendants I through V" Results 981 - 1000 of 12,260
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
It provides that only MA holders of drugs approved through the NDA pathway (which, as a rule, are the reference-listed ones) are allowed to request approval for including new therapeutic indications (Annex I, Item 11). [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Defendants' arguments that the statute does not engage in viewpoint discrimination is thoroughly unpersuasive. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 4:40 am by Phil Dixon
In this case from the Eastern District of Virginia, the defendant (a disgruntled former security officer) threatened to kill a former coworker through multiple emails and was arrested under a state threats law. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 11:44 am by Tobin Admin
In 1985, the parties reached a structured settlement to resolve her claims wherein the defendants, through the insurance company, agreed to pay her $1,700 per month for life, increasing at 4% per year, as well as various additional lump sum payments during certain years. [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 6:00 am by Joseph L. Hyde
  But does the State affirmatively have to allege and prove a lack of consent? [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 7:17 pm by Michael Lowe
§ 952: outlaws the importation of any (1) Schedule I or II controlled substance and any (2) Schedule III, IV, or V narcotics into the United States; and 21 U.S.C. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 6:10 am by Frank O. Bowman, III
Here I consider only the main arguments concerning “parole” of undocumented migrants and control of the southern border generally. [read post]
12 Mar 2023, 9:31 am by Dave Maass
When prisoners' art could potentially disclose military secrets, we're well through the looking glass. [read post]
11 Mar 2023, 4:24 am by centerforartlaw
J: I think it probably does because it at least is an expression of legislative intent in the modern era favoring restitution. [read post]