Search for: "Doe II v. Doe I"
Results 981 - 1000
of 12,364
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Nov 2010, 2:15 am
Why does value matter? [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 5:00 pm
Doe v. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 8:02 pm
It does not apply to civil service employees covered by Title II of the FMLA. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 9:05 pm
§ 512(c)(1)(A)(ii). [read post]
1 Jan 2020, 2:43 pm
But what most struck my attention was Roberts's apparent belief that Brown v. [read post]
19 Sep 2009, 4:58 am
The Ninth Circuit gutted the red flag doctrine in Perfect 10 v. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 9:04 am
I chose to analyze a large chunk of application pairs[ii] to see whether word stems present in the non-provisional claims[iii] were also present in the corresponding parent provisionals. [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 11:49 am
Part I includes a discussion of Apodaca v. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 5:00 am
The case is Antonick v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 2:32 pm
Due to the effect that their lobbying is evidently having I will address these in Part I. [read post]
18 Nov 2017, 2:22 pm
Justice Cullity’s reasoning on this point in Easingwood v. [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 8:31 pm
[6/09/09 Update: See also my analysis of the Chrysler Sale Opinion (Part I) and (Part II).] [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 8:27 pm
Blogs listed below may be "IPKat-approved", which does not mean that the IPKat approves of them but that (i) this Kat provides some technical and logistical assistance as well as content and that (ii) the blogs do not carry paid-for advertising, pop-ups, banners, small ads via Adsense and so on. [read post]
31 May 2007, 5:15 am
" However, the credit card is the "physical embodiment of the services," and the design on the card will not be perceived as a mark for the services.In sum, the Board ruled that the tortoise shell design is not inherently distinctive and does not serve as a mark because:"(i) it is not unique or unusual in the field; (ii) it is a mere refinement of the common practice of using background designs on credit cards; and, (ii) it does not… [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 2:17 am
In Bluearc Corporation v. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 1:48 pm
In Nixon v. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 8:39 am
I previously described this pro se lawsuit: “Elansari is Muslim. [read post]
12 Sep 2024, 5:12 am
My cue for the argument I'm exploring is a 1992 opinion by Justice Scalia.In R.A.V. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2022, 8:30 am
" II. [read post]
