Search for: "Does 1-27"
Results 981 - 1000
of 12,435
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Dec 2008, 1:32 pm
Therefore, (1) automatic denial of statutory damages under HRS §101-27 in Condemnation 1 is vacated and the case remanded for a determination of damages, (2) the court's conclusion that Condemnation 2 was not abated by Condemnation 2 is vacated and the case remanded for a determination of whether the public purpose asserted in Condemnation 2 was pretextual.Slip op. at 5. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 11:55 am
The Chief Justice issued a dissenting and concurring opinion in which she opined that AB x1 27 does not on its face compel the violation of Proposition 22. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 4:05 am
Say-on-Pay: Now 71 Failures - How Does That Compare With My Early Season Poll? [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 10:24 am
CEQA does not apply to the ministerial act of issuing a well permit. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 5:01 pm
The board does not agree with this statement. [read post]
2 May 2018, 1:10 am
The Board concluded that, while D3 does indeed not show that injected myoblasts as claimed do exert a therapeutic effect in the context of stress urinary incontinence, it nevertheless does provide data and information which render said therapeutic effect plausible. [read post]
2 May 2018, 1:10 am
The Board concluded that, while D3 does indeed not show that injected myoblasts as claimed do exert a therapeutic effect in the context of stress urinary incontinence, it nevertheless does provide data and information which render said therapeutic effect plausible. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 10:46 pm
Among the 6 case-patients with available information, 1 case-patient was hospitalized; 0 deaths have been reported. [read post]
3 Aug 2007, 6:57 am
New Jersey 27. [read post]
3 Aug 2007, 6:57 am
New Jersey 27. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 9:08 am
Why does your website need to be responsively designed (i.e. mobile, tablet, PC, Mac friendly)? [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 8:51 am
Super. 1 (App. [read post]
4 Aug 2012, 6:55 am
Personally, I am all geared up for when it comes to Stratford on Sunday (July 1). [read post]
3 Jan 2016, 5:33 am
For those that are prosecuted, does the punishment fit the crime? [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 12:01 pm
., John Does/Jane Does 1-30, and other businesses and/or corporations, whose identities and involvement are as of yet unknown, as defendants. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 10:33 am
Rptr.3d 1, review denied (April 27, 2011)). [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 8:29 am
. - As does happen, The Prof can flub. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 9:46 am
The appellant lodged the appeal on the grounds of an alleged public prior use anticipating granted claim 1 and inventive step.The appellant argued that a skilled person could have easily reproduced the claimed composition starting from a product which was publicly sold before the filing date of the patent in suit.However, the BoA stated that mere public disposal of a product does not give the skilled person sufficient information on how to make that product. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 9:46 am
The appellant lodged the appeal on the grounds of an alleged public prior use anticipating granted claim 1 and inventive step.The appellant argued that a skilled person could have easily reproduced the claimed composition starting from a product which was publicly sold before the filing date of the patent in suit.However, the BoA stated that mere public disposal of a product does not give the skilled person sufficient information on how to make that product. [read post]
11 May 2022, 1:54 pm
See Memo. in Support of Motion to Unseal and Oppose Pseudonymity, ECF No. 27-1, at 8-9. [read post]
