Search for: "Does 1-4 v. United States Attorney Office"
Results 981 - 1000
of 1,996
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2017, 8:56 am
(2) Does the ICCTA preempt a state agency’s voluntary commitments to comply with CEQA as a condition of receiving state funds for a state owned rail line and/or leasing state-owned property? [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 3:55 pm
Advisers should be careful that sensitive conversations regarding the annual review are protected by attorney-client privilege. [read post]
31 Dec 2016, 12:36 pm
Tweets are my own. (51) @VLJeker – V. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 8:33 am
Doe v. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 1:35 pm
& A. 1943) (stating in a will context Such burden does not shi [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 12:42 pm
Medical expenses can be deducted in the inheritance tax.Under United States Supreme Court Case, Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc., v. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 2:37 pm
This paragraph does not preclude legitimate advice or advocacy consistent with these Rules. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 7:17 am
United States 16-142 Issue: Whether 21 U.S.C. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 11:20 am
United States, 16-142. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:11 am
James Wolffe QC, now appears in support of the Respondents. 15.16 Lavery QC states that the will of Parliament should not overrule the will of the Irish people and that the triggering of article 50 without their consent would do just that. 15.14 Lavery QC says that Northern Ireland has a complex constitutional settlement that is legally binding as a result of section 1 of the Northern Ireland Act 1998. 15.10 Lavery QC says that section 1 of the Northern… [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 12:18 pm
Retractable Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 8:19 am
United States silly-case-name award. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 12:50 pm
Louisiana 15-8114 Issues: (1) Whether, when counsel fully concedes the client’s guilt to all charges over the client’s express objection, counsel’s performance amounts to a complete failure to subject the prosecution’s case to meaningful adversarial testing so that the United States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 11:06 am
’ United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 4:00 am
Alice Woolley argued that he was, citing the opening paragraph of his majority opinion in Canada (Attorney General) v Igloo Vikski Inc. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 6:19 am
(relisted after the November 4 conference) Broom v. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 5:50 am
Stotz, supra.The opinion then addresses the filing of criminal charges, noting that in November of 2012,EPS submitted a formal complaint to the Economic Crime Unit of the Denver District Attorney's (DA's) office, seeking criminal prosecution of defendants. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 11:20 am
The opinion goes on to explain that [a]ppellant is an attorney licensed to practice law in the state of Colorado, where he maintains an office and has been practicing environmental law since 1986. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 9:01 pm
On April 10, 2013, Manuel filed a lawsuit in federal court, by himself without an attorney, against the City of Joliet and various of its officers, asserting that defendants, acting as state officials, had violated his federal constitutional rights in violation of a federal civil rights law known as “section 1983” (which is a reference to a specific provision in the United States Code). [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 12:24 pm
On April 1, 2011, an Illinois state police lab test confirmed that the pills were not ecstasy. [read post]
