Search for: "Downs v. State of California" Results 981 - 1000 of 6,448
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2012, 10:47 am by Orin Kerr
Judge Reinhardt’s amicus brief in favor of striking down Prop 8 — aimed squarely at Justice Kennedy, naturally, and based largely on his opinion in Romer v. [read post]
7 Aug 2007, 12:17 pm
So it asks the California Supreme Court.What's the purpose of the San Diego ordinance shutting down adult video stores between 2 and 6 in the morning, you ask? [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 5:30 am by Kevin
For more on this topic, including the story of the one published legal opinion involving moon-rock ownership, see "United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 2:39 pm by Kaufman Dolowich Voluck
Bonta, 594 U.S. __ (2021, S.Ct. docket 19-251), Chief Justice John Roberts, writing for the 6-3 majority, struck down a California law requiring charities to disclose their major donors, or be barred from activities within the Golden State. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 1:45 pm by seo
In that regard, on June 12, 2012, the United States Supreme Court ruled in United States v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 1:45 pm by seo
In that regard, on June 12, 2012, the United States Supreme Court ruled in United States v. [read post]
This is particularly true for employers who are required to quickly shut down operations by state or local mandate, such as bars and gyms in many California cities. [read post]
26 Mar 2025, 3:07 pm by NARF
H.R.2302 - To take certain Federal land in the State of California into trust for the benefit of the Shingle Springs Band of Miwok Indians, and for other purposes. [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 8:37 am by MBettman
On August 30, 2016, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in Carter v. [read post]
When the decision came down, some states already had laws that criminalized abortions, taking effect immediately upon the overruling of Roe v. [read post]
21 Aug 2007, 2:53 pm
We've seen this case before:  Engine Manufacturers Association v. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 5:09 am by Timothy P. Flynn
  The appellate judge suggested that perhaps the issue could be posed to the California Supreme Court for a determination as to whether California law would allow any entity to stand in as a legal “proxy” for the suit.Perry’s well-heeled lawyers stated in response to the suggestion that even if California law allowed a proxy-style legal fight, the proxy would be unable to demonstrate how they were harmed by lifting the ban against same-sex… [read post]