Search for: "Early v. State"
Results 981 - 1000
of 18,379
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 3:43 am
In this post, Ross Ludlow, Legal Support Assistant at Matrix Chambers, comments on the case of R v Maughan (Northern Ireland) [2022] UKSC 13. [read post]
30 May 2017, 1:16 pm
The new paper is Ben Grunwald & Andrew V. [read post]
30 May 2017, 1:16 pm
The new paper is Ben Grunwald & Andrew V. [read post]
17 May 2024, 4:47 pm
In early 2009, Kolkata Municipal Corporation attempted to “forcefully enter and occupy” a property on Narkeldanga North Road that belonged to Birinchi Bihari Shah. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 4:29 am
Starting on Monday 30 January 2012 are the appeals of PP v Secretary of State for the Home Department, (formerly VV [Jordan]), PP v Secretary of State for the Home Department, W & BB v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Z, G, U & Y v Secretary of State for the Home Department, scheduled for 1.5 days to be heard by Lords Phillips, Brown, Kerr, Dyson and Wilson. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 1:56 pm
United States (Endangered Species Act; Yellowstone Grizzlies)Dossett v. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 6:28 am
In total, plaintiff spent 686 days in jail for violating the terms of his PRS after the Court of Appeals said in Early v. [read post]
12 Aug 2009, 3:45 am
Early last year, in State v. [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 11:05 am
As of today, a federal judge and the President of the United States support the result in Texas v. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm
While there are some distinctions, Lou, a leading constitutional authority on national security law and separation of powers, found a case as early as 1912, Firth Sterling Steel Co. v. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 10:41 am
Yesterday I argued the case of State v. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 1:16 pm
See Tandon v. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 5:51 pm
The Supreme Court properly exercised its discretion when it denied the part of the motion which requested attorney fees (Difone v Difone 87 D3d 971, Taormina v Taormina 131 AD3 696). [read post]
31 May 2011, 1:00 pm
Article V concerns capital punishment. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 12:09 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Montana. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 6:41 am
” In these early days of transition, states are still figuring out what they want the legal status of abortion to be, ever since Dobbs overruled both Roe v. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 6:41 am
” In these early days of transition, states are still figuring out what they want the legal status of abortion to be, ever since Dobbs overruled both Roe v. [read post]
17 Oct 2020, 4:14 pm
The case FCC v. [read post]
