Search for: "Ford v. United States"
Results 981 - 1000
of 1,124
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Mar 2009, 10:06 am
In United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 7:20 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: US CAFC: Continuation limits invalid; limits on claims and RCEs are ok: Tafas v Doll (Patently-O) (Law360) (Hal Wegner) (IAM) (Patent Baristas) (Promote the Progress) (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (IP Spotlight) (Inventive Step) (IP Watchdog) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Anticipate This!) [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 1:26 pm
Sentence is remanded for resentencing in light of Amendment 709 to the United States Sentencing Guideline U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, March 19, 2009 US v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 1:47 am
"
United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 5:59 am
Ford v. [read post]
7 Mar 2009, 11:21 am
GM, Chrysler and Ford would fall into this category. [read post]
1 Mar 2009, 12:57 am
" "In the United States there was not, after the beginning of the last quarter of the century, any opportunity whatever for individual enterprise in any important field of industry, unless backed by great capital. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 8:30 pm
§ 2340, a statutory provision enacted in the wake of the United States' ratification of the Torture Convention, but well after the civil war in El Salvador. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 8:30 pm
§ 2340, a statutory provision enacted in the wake of the United States' ratification of the Torture Convention, but well after the civil war in El Salvador. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 2:41 am
Cardiologists implanted a covered stent manufactured by NuMed, Inc., a New York corporation that is one of the few developers of pediatric medical devices in the United States. [read post]
14 Feb 2009, 11:56 am
Part V identifies key unresolved issues in the state courts. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 8:18 am
The recent decision in Birmingham City Council v Forde [2009] EWHC 12 (QB) is a worrying one both for Defendants and for the legal profession generally. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 8:33 am
After the district court in the United States had dismissed the plaintiffs’ case the first time based on forum non conveniens, and while that dismissal was on appeal, the plaintiffs also hired Dr. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 8:33 am
After the district court in the United States had dismissed the plaintiffs’ case the first time based on forum non conveniens, and while that dismissal was on appeal, the plaintiffs also hired Dr. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 12:01 am
A lack of precision in a shoeprint expert's testimony was not a bar to the expert testimony, in United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2009, 6:43 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
Volkswagon-based transfer mandamus order in In re TS Tech USA (Inventive Step) (Hal Wegner) (EDTexweblog.com) (EDTexweblog.com) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Patently-O) (Law360) (Patent Prospector) ECJ decides Obelix too famous to be confused with MOBILIX mobile phone service: Les Éditions Albert René Sàrl v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market, Orange A/S (Class 46) (IPKat) Global Global – General Moral… [read post]
26 Dec 2008, 9:10 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 10:55 pm
We find that the district court properly exercised its discretion to impose a sentence without a presentence report under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32(c)(1)(A)(ii) and United States Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 6A1.1(a)(2). [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 3:00 pm
(Class 46) Reminiscences on ‘i Intel’ (Class 46) Portugal Portugal makes extra-budgetary contribution to WIPO capacity building projects (WIPO) Spain The Princess and the Trade Mark Office - High Court of Catalunya overturns SPTO refusal of Spanish trade mark applications for Letizia de Giorgi marks (Class 46) United Kingdom Professor Adrian Sterling’s orphan works scheme (IPKat) Movie industry: London ‘fake-free… [read post]
