Search for: "Frank Banks"
Results 981 - 1000
of 5,206
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2018, 6:01 am
Posted by David Ingles and Sven Mickisch, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, on Monday, May 14, 2018 Tags: Banks, Capital requirements, Dodd-Frank Act, Financial institutions, Financial regulation, Liquidity, Mergers & acquisitions, SIFIs, Stress tests Discovery Trends in Litigation Finance Arrangements Posted by Alan R. [read post]
16 May 2018, 7:31 pm
Opponents of the bill argue it would needlessly pare back important Dodd-Frank protections to the benefit of large and profitable banks. [read post]
14 May 2018, 6:15 am
Senate approved the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief and Consumer Protection Act, a bipartisan bill that would repeal or modify certain provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act and eliminate or ease a number of regulatory burdens on superregional, regional and large community banks. [read post]
11 May 2018, 7:22 am
Four years later, Keating seemingly had increased the assets of the bank from about $1 billion to more than $5 billion. [read post]
9 May 2018, 4:35 pm
Frank v. [read post]
8 May 2018, 12:31 pm
She also, of course, pointed to the recent record-setting consent order against a major bank. [read post]
8 May 2018, 6:37 am
So well done Frank Industries, owner of a registration for LDNR – a women’s activewear brand – for taking on Nike over its use of the same mark in a high profile advertising campaign. [read post]
8 May 2018, 3:38 am
Derivatives reform since Dodd-Frank. [read post]
3 May 2018, 1:50 pm
” The letter asserted the usual reason for such confidentiality, which is to facilitate “open, frank and independent assessments of the pertinent law and facts—uninhibited by political and improper influences that may be present outside the Department”—i.e., in Congress. [read post]
2 May 2018, 4:26 am
” At Bloomberg, Greg Stohr reports that in Frank v. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 8:49 am
Doug Lamborn Should Be Kept Off the 2018 Ballot, Colorado Supreme Court RulesDenver Post – Jesse Paul, Mark Matthews, and John Frank | Published: 4/23/2018 The Colorado Supreme Court ruled U.S. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 6:03 am
Although Dodd-Frank did not except small banks from the clearing requirement, it specifically invited the CFTC to do so. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 4:26 am
Based on the extensive experience of Ballard Spahr attorneys in representing bank and non-bank clients in connection with more than 50 CFPB investigations, our comment letter include proposals to address the lack of basic procedural safeguards in the CFPB’s current CID process and help alleviate the unreasonable burdens that the current process imposes on CID recipients. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 1:46 pm
Law schools should collaborate with the NCBE and state bar associations on the creation of a materials, lectures, multiple choice question banks such that students take the bar exam after they complete one year of law school. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 11:01 am
When he resigned, Richard Cordray appointed the Deputy Director, Leandra English, to succeed him, in accordance with the Dodd-Frank Act (12 U.S.C. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 6:01 am
., on Friday, April 13, 2018 Tags: Appraisal rights, Charter & bylaws, Delaware law, DGCL, DGCL Section 102, DGCL Section 204, DGCL Section 205, DGCL Section 262, Mergers & acquisitions, Shareholder voting, State law Dodd-Frank is a Pigouvian Regulation Posted by Aaron M. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 8:40 pm
These indirect lenders include captive finance companies of auto manufacturers, but also banks (e.g., Santander has a large business in this space). [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 3:29 pm
In order to minimize the risks that large financial institutions will fail, Title I of Dodd-Frank establishes an enhanced prudential regulatory regime for certain large bank holding companies and non-bank financial companies. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 11:28 am
And Section 1042 of the Dodd-Frank Act (codified at 12 U.S.C. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 8:24 am
” To illustrate his point, Mulvaney quipped in his opening remarks that Dodd-Frank merely required him to “appear” before Congress, but not to answer any questions. [read post]
