Search for: "Frank v. United States" Results 981 - 1000 of 2,047
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 May 2011, 4:04 pm by Don Cruse
In re Frank Kent Motor Co. d/b/a Frank Kent Cadillac, No. 10-0687 (DB). [read post]
28 Jul 2007, 9:32 am
Defendant also argues that his 360-month sentence of incarceration is unreasonable in light of United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 4:23 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which asks whether the government must obtain a warrant before acquiring cell-site-location information from wireless carriers, that “question the factual and legal assumptions of the pro-Carpenter briefs. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 4:59 am by Jennifer González
– Illus. in: Frank Leslie’s illustrated newspaper, v. 57, 1884 Jan. 5, p. 309. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 5:23 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
18 Sep 2024, 11:31 am by Eugene Volokh
United States, 517 U.S. 690, 697-98 (1996) (concluding that "independent appellate review" of Fourth Amendment probable cause determinations means that "even where one case may not squarely control another one, the two decisions when viewed together may usefully add to the body of law on the subject"). [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 11:02 am by Michael Lowe
The retail industry in the United States has yet to solve its growing problem of “retail shrink,” which is defined as “the difference between the amount of merchandise (or inventory) that the retail company owns on its books, and the results of a physical count of the merchandise. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 10:13 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
Butts, Jr., Fotios Geivelis, Jr., also known as Frank Anastasio, Worldwide Funding III Limited LLC, Douglas J. [read post]
11 Nov 2007, 12:58 pm
The United States Trustee's Office for the Northern District of Mississippi moved to transfer the cases. [read post]
15 Dec 2006, 1:25 am
DISTRICT COURTEASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal Practice Seized Account Funds Must Be Returned; Lis Pendens Against 'Substitute' Forfeitable Properties Vacated United States v. [read post]