Search for: "Held v. State"
Results 981 - 1000
of 82,097
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Feb 2021, 8:21 am
In X (South Yorkshire) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWHC 2954 (Admin), the Divisional Court declared that the Guidance was unlawful insofar as it did not require the decision maker to consider whether to invite the subject to make representations. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 7:50 am
United States (police improperly extended traffic stop to conduct dog sniff of car). [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 9:50 am
Bank v. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 11:50 am
Hood v. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 11:50 am
Hood v. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 9:20 am
On June 16, 2014, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Republic of Argentina v. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 9:20 am
On June 16, 2014, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Republic of Argentina v. [read post]
21 May 2014, 6:54 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 4:10 am
(ii) The narrow vires ground Previously, in the case of Alvi v Secretary of State [2012] 1 WLR 2208, the Supreme Court had held that if a matter fell within the scope of s 3(2) of the 1971 Act, it must be regulated in the Immigration Rules and could not be validly regulated by other means, such as by the Secretary of State’s policy. [read post]
5 Feb 2019, 1:13 pm
Last week the Supreme Judicial Court (SJC) issued its decision in Yee v. [read post]
20 Nov 2019, 10:01 am
In Clinton v. [read post]
23 Feb 2019, 3:07 pm
Timbs v. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 7:46 am
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit recently held that the Bankruptcy Code does not preempt state law claims brought by non-debtors for damages related to the filing of an involuntary bankruptcy proceeding. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 6:29 am
Therein, the court held that… Read more → The post Internet Slander: Can You Sue In Florida Even If The Slander Was Posted Out Of State? [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 10:30 am
Yesterday, the United States of America filed a motion to intervene and for reconsideration in the Unique Product Solutions v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 7:27 am
The US Supreme Court [official website] ruled [opinion, PDF] 5-3 Thursday in Mathis v. [read post]
13 Oct 2022, 7:02 am
The Decalogue Society of Chicago invited Professors Nicole Garnett of Notre Dame Law School, Michael Helfand of Pepperdine Law School and me to speak about government funding and church-state separation in light of the Supreme Court’s June 2022 decision in Carson v. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 8:27 am
Ozimals, Inc., the District Court for the Northern District of California held that any of the plaintiff’s state law claims premised upon the defendant’s alleged fraudulent DMCA takedown notices [...] [read post]
6th Cir. Rejects FDCPA Allegations of State Procedural Violations, Misrepresentations, Citing Spokeo
2 May 2017, 7:12 am
Relying on Spokeo, Inc. v. [read post]
