Search for: "Hughes, Appeal of" Results 981 - 1000 of 2,195
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Nov 2016, 6:00 am by Aidan Wills
The appeal was heard by Lords Neuberger, Kerr, Reed, Hughes and Dyson; a video recording of the hearing is available here. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 2:05 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The Supreme Court unanimously dismissed the defendant’s appeal. [read post]
27 Nov 2016, 11:00 pm by Matrix Legal Support Service
The panel will be Lady Hale, Lord Kerr and Lord Hughes. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 11:30 am by Sherry F. Colb
Colb, a Justia columnist, is Professor of Law and Charles Evans Hughes Scholar at Cornell Law School. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 1:15 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The panel will be Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lord Mance, Lord Sumption, Lord Carnwath, Lord Hughes, and Lord Toulson. [read post]
26 Oct 2016, 4:34 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The defendants now must decide whether they will appeal; for that matter, the FDIC will have to consider whether, if the defendants appeal, it will cross appeal. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 6:31 am by Joy Waltemath
Justice Hughes concurred in the result only, while Justice Wright filed a separate dissenting opinion (Kentucky Restaurant Association v. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 6:09 am by Dan Tench
Ingenious Media and Mr McKenna appealed and were given permission to appeal to the Court of Appeal. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
Colb, a Justia columnist, is Professor of Law and Charles Evans Hughes Scholar at Cornell Law School. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 1:50 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The panel will be Lord Kerr, Lord Clarke, Lord Hughes, Lord Toulson and Lord Hodge. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 5:17 pm by Dennis Crouch
  Then, in Teva, the Supreme Court held that extrinsic factual conclusions of a district court must be given deference on appeal. [read post]
1 Oct 2016, 4:53 pm by INFORRM
“Right to be forgotten” requires anonymisation of online newspaper archive – Hugh Tomlinson QC Daily Mail: “Child killer’s £2m legal aid” Two million things wrong with this headline – Lucy Reed Keith Vaz, an outbreak of morality? [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
Indiana, the Court of Appeals of Indiana held that police violated their suspect’s Fourth Amendment rights by acquiring, without first obtaining a warrant, cell site information identifying his whereabouts at various points (during his commission of the crimes for which he was convicted) from his cell phone provider. [read post]