Search for: "Hughes v. State" Results 981 - 1000 of 1,957
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Dec 2015, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
The California judge who ruled on Findley v. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 12:25 pm
  His approach:  draw attention away from Sprint Fidelis by focusing on Hughes and Stengel. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 6:01 am by Barry Sookman
Owens: Crying wolf over the Trans-Pacific Partnership https://t.co/WQDJOIwsAI Hugh Stephens The TPP’s Intellectual Property Provisions: The “Worst Public Policy Decision in the Country’s History”? [read post]
12 Dec 2015, 7:09 am by Elina Saxena
Ben alerted us to the European Court of Human Rights’ opinion in Roman Zakharov v. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 1:28 pm by Elina Saxena
” He also stated that Turkish forces were in Iraq to train and equip forces fighting the Islamic State and that Turkish presence in the country was no secret. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 7:37 am
 Indeed, the practice of obtaining and executing Anton Piller orders was subject to a critical review by Mr Justice Scott in Columbia Picture Industries v Robinson [1986] (and see also the article "Piller problems"(1990) 106 LQR 601 by Professor Dockray and, as he then was, Hugh Laddie QC). [read post]
5 Dec 2015, 5:38 am by Elina Saxena
Cody linked to the recently published report from Lorenzo Vidino and Seamus Hughes of the Program on Extremism at George Washington University entitled ISIS in America: From Retweets to Raqqa. [read post]
29 Nov 2015, 4:00 am by Barry Sookman
Slattery https://t.co/HVwCG11vor -> When words mean what they say: Bob Marley copyrights stay where they are https://t.co/7J541q5DxM -> Austria's highest court mulls class action status for Schrems v Facebook https://t.co/YtgRLzFp4z -> Computer and Internet Updates for 2015-11-22: Computer and Internet Weekly Updates for 2015-11-21: Computer an… https://t.co/HTYYbAhWBv -> Hospital clerk fined $36,000 for selling patient records https://t.co/8Yl90bliZE -> Third… [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 7:05 am
"In 1941, the year Hughes left the court, Chief Justice Roberts said, 'you had two senators on the court, a representative, three former attorneys general.' The court that decided Brown v. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 8:00 am by Alice Grainger, Levison Meltzer Pigott
In terms of materiality, he considered the House of Lords’ decision in Livesey (formerly Jenkins) v. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 9:07 pm by Steve Vladeck
 The Fourteenth Amendment and the Power of States to Ban Refugees 100 years ago this month, the Supreme Court decided Truax v. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 1:51 am by INFORRM
The South East Counter Terrorism Unit used a Production Order under the Terrorism Act to obtain the laptop after he interviewed a British-born Islamic State fighter. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 10:05 am by John Elwood
The Court granted without first relisting in Hughes v. [read post]