Search for: "In Interest of Potter"
Results 981 - 1000
of 1,028
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2021, 4:00 am
McGahn Elaborates on Mueller Testimony, but Stops Short of Condemning Trump in Interview with Congress MSN – Karoun Demirjian, Rosalind Helderman, Tom Hamburger, and Felicia Sonmez (Washington Post) | Published: 6/9/2021 Former White House counsel Donald McGahn told lawmakers he was seeking to avoid “a chain reaction that would be not in anyone’s interest” when he ignored then-President Trump’s direction to fire the special counsel investigating… [read post]
28 May 2010, 9:50 pm
Many innovations aren’t interesting to producers (asset specificity: not useful), of course, whereas others are held for competitive reasons, but the percentage of innovations transferred was in the 22-26% range in international comparisons. 48%-60% were transferred at no cost. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 8:00 am
For the Balkinization 20th Anniversary SymposiumSandy Levinson I have been teaching courses on American constitutional law for almost 50 years. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 6:01 am
A review of Noah Feldman, “The Broken Constitution: Lincoln, Slavery, and the Refounding of America” (Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2021). *** “It only has been radicals who have changed this country. [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 8:57 am
Recent reporting on the human rights crisis in the Xinjiang Uighur Autonomous Region has revealed the United States to be a major consumer in the global marketplace for forced Uighur labor. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 11:07 am
Rowling’s “Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone” a little better… well, sort of, anyway. [read post]
6 Feb 2008, 11:51 am
And fantasy-sports junkies can’t claim superiority over face-painting superfan yahoos, either, because they watch every game with conflicting rooting interests. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 7:23 am
Graetz & Greenhouse: No, we didn’t think of that AP photo as a metaphor, but it is an interesting point. [read post]
14 May 2019, 7:29 am
The Senate, the media and special interest groups were far more cavalier as well. [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:44 am
If Elena Kagan, say, is a swing justice in a particular case and if she is responsive to arguments based on the twentieth century canon, both sides will take this into account in framing their arguments – if progressives rely on canonical materials to support their case, conservatives will counter that these materials, when properly construed, actually give new support for their position.What is more, conservatives will often find it in their interest to emphasize the… [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 11:15 pm
When I first heard of the improvement to Hey Siri, my thought was that it was interesting but that I wou [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 2:13 pm
And we learn one very interesting, and useful, fact about Wolfman. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 3:44 pm
(Wilkinson v Kitzinger [2007] EWHC 2022 (Fam), [2007] UKHRR 164, para 107, per Sir Mark Potter P) I'm not sure this reasoning hol [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 7:00 am
For voting-rights advocates who strive to maximize participation in state and federal elections, the end of the Supreme Court’s October 2022 term in June brought both relief and cause for concern. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm
In addition, U.S. law generally requires that, when engaging in rulemaking, a federal agency must give notice of the proposed rulemaking and solicit comment from interested parties on the proposed rule.[4] This process has been described as “notice and comment. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 11:00 am
Panel 2: Emerging Media: Commentary, Criticism and the New Publishing Paradigm David Bollier, Public Knowledge board member Pat Aufderheide, American University Center for Social Media Director: Excited by the increased attention to fair use. [read post]
14 Dec 2021, 5:54 pm
Stuart Brotman: Wasn’t this because the law firm representing The New York Times declined the case because of a conflict of interest? [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 3:15 am
Potter, No. 07-35496 (9th Cir. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 9:13 pm
Unlike his audiences, Houdini knew that these adversaries wouldn’t try too hard to thwart him; their interests were aligned. [read post]
6 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
Franks’ statement explains the organizational dynamics and financial interests that have subsequently led social media platforms to largely abandon protections they put in place after January 6, 2021, including restoring former President Donald Trump’s accounts and dropping policies related to false claims about the legitimacy of the 2020 election. [read post]
