Search for: "In Re CAL"
Results 981 - 1000
of 5,797
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Oct 2019, 4:58 pm
At first glance, I thought this opinion highlighted yet another danger of being a landlord: the risk you're going to get stabbed an killed by your tenant. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 4:48 pm
You’re going to snip the sensor tags off the merchandise. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 1:07 pm
You're having a great time. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 1:18 pm
The Court of Appeal holds that the existing statute -- Section 8003 -- only bars candidates from running for multiple offices in the same election if they're running as independents, not if they're running (as here) in a primary election. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 9:31 am
And, while they're at it, they need to grant review in the case from March as well. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 11:29 am
But you're allowed to sue two different parties in two different lawsuits. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 12:32 pm
As a practical matter, they're hard to write. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 1:43 pm
Now, if you'd have let the thing collapse, yeah, you're covered.But you're an idiot. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 2:10 pm
I mean, you're probably going to get sued for that.But it gets worse.Not satisfied when each of the workers says they're not responsible -- having had the supervisor scream "Are you on your period?! [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 1:13 pm
But the Court of Appeal seems exactly right when it says that if you record all the calls, you pretty much know for sure that you're going to record confidential calls, so you're liable. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 1:15 pm
And unless you have familiarity with and exposure to the various offices, you never know what you might find once you're forced to litigate in a new county.Those attorneys who have ever been forced to confront a less-than-sublime Clerk's Office will appreciate this opinion by Justice Premo. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 10:58 am
The California Supreme Court says that it's okay to simply file written objections, and if the trial court doesn't rule on them, they're presumed overruled and you can argue error in the Court of Appeal if you'd like. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 11:45 am
So if you're convicted of misdemeanor sexual battery (as David was here in Count II), that's fair.(2) More relevant to this appeal, however -- and to most of us law-abiding citizens as well-- it's not illegal to be flipping through channels on the television and stumble across an NBC, HBO, or (even) Cinimax program. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 10:25 am
California makes it illegal to wear body armor if you're a serious violent felon. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 2:13 pm
Cal Spoon asked me to speak at the Mend The Fracture Conference. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 2:03 pm
Most of the time, we don't leave a police encounter, even if it's unwanted (as it often is), because we don't want to be rude or because we're not sure we're allowed. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 4:59 am
Heritage Bank (In re Hart), 564 F. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 3:21 pm
Cal. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 10:11 am
Cal.) [read post]
