Search for: "In Re Kennedy"
Results 981 - 1000
of 4,536
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 May 2018, 2:30 pm
Kennedy about to retire from the Supreme Court? [read post]
21 May 2018, 2:37 pm
We’re starting to hear from people who have read the book and it’s starting to feel like we didn’t throw the book off a cliff. [read post]
20 May 2018, 3:41 am
Kennedy’s New Frontier was about seizing the future, not trying to survive the present. [read post]
19 May 2018, 2:38 pm
(quoting In re U. [read post]
18 May 2018, 10:33 am
” And Kagan observed, “We’re in a world in which the first-best option, which is five people agreeing on the reasoning, that doesn’t exist. [read post]
17 May 2018, 9:01 pm
So my message to any one of the nine Supreme Court justices, if you’re thinking about quitting this year, do it yesterday. [read post]
17 May 2018, 10:31 am
Three Republican senators voted for the resolution, including Collins of Maine, Kennedy of Louisiana and Murkowski of Alaska. [read post]
16 May 2018, 4:35 pm
Well, they’re pretty honest. [read post]
16 May 2018, 7:16 am
No: Chief Justice O’Connor and Justice Kennedy. [read post]
15 May 2018, 10:03 am
We’re pleased that that the Court refused to let a private contract dictate Fourth Amendment rights in this case, and we hope it’s instructive to other courts, particularly those confronted with the argument that terms of service undermine users’ expectation of privacy in third party email. [read post]
15 May 2018, 4:19 am
Richard Re has this blog’s argument analysis. [read post]
[Orin Kerr] Byrd v. United States: The Supreme Court Takes a Broad View of Fourth Amendment Standing
15 May 2018, 4:12 am
Perhaps Byrd is another data point for my thesis that we're in an era of expanding Fourth Amendment rights but retreating Fourth Amendment [read post]
14 May 2018, 6:46 am
Judge Russell Mock of the First District Court of Appeals sat for Justice O’Neill, and joined Justice Kennedy’s opinion. [read post]
10 May 2018, 9:49 am
In the Eleventh Circuit, on the other hand, an early motion to dismiss can work, as illustrated by Kennedy v. [read post]
10 May 2018, 8:00 am
Kennedy, who wrote the new 6-to-3 decision. [read post]
8 May 2018, 11:49 pm
Kennedy & Darren J. [read post]
7 May 2018, 1:51 pm
Gov’t influencing/coercing speech is something we’re not comfortable with. [read post]
7 May 2018, 10:30 am
Or, put differently, We’re the cops, and you’re not. [read post]
4 May 2018, 4:22 am
” Counting to 5 (podcast) features a discussion of “three newly granted cases for next term, and … a broad overview of where we stand in the current term: the opinions we’ve seen so far and the cases we’re still waiting on. [read post]
1 May 2018, 9:01 pm
And Justice Kennedy was talking about the expansion of standing to cover additional kinds of disputes, not to cover beings who, absent congressional action, would lack standing. [read post]
