Search for: "In Re Sherman"
Results 981 - 1000
of 1,096
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Aug 2010, 8:46 am
Since they’re already big. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 1:46 pm
Applying the “rule of reason” and principles of Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 4:30 am
Res. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 6:00 am
Despite the letter authors’ claims, neither a paucity of avenues for “economic, social, and political activity on the internet” nor the general state of market competition in the United States establishes an “urgent need” to re-write the antitrust laws to saddle a small group of firms with unprecedented legal obligations. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 9:43 am
Res. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 10:23 am
The common law nature of Sherman Act jurisprudence contemplates that courts will grow in their knowledge of the economic effects of various practices. [read post]
23 Jan 2025, 5:03 am
The lawsuit that the U.S. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 11:21 am
This observation holds true in all business-crimes prosecutions but is particularly apt for a criminal Sherman Act prosecution. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 7:06 pm
We're not going to get into that because we're drug and device guys and all we know about seafood - well, when we see food, we eat it.Yeah, we know.... our humor smells like a dead fish, doesn't it? [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 8:48 am
A lesson for brand owners – Dispute over ILLICIT mark (International Law Office) Nigeria How not to create a new name: Lessons from NiGaz (Afro-IP) Poland Trade mark issues on a geographical name of gmina (Class 46) South Africa Independent Communications Authority of SA publishes position paper on whether there is a need to reform laws relating to copyright ownership in commissioned works (Afro-IP) South African authors seek first public lending right in a… [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:59 am
[Guidance for judicial examination of legal history.] [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 2:33 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Australian Review of National Innovation System released: (IPRoo), (Mallesons Stephen Jaques), (creativecommons.org), (IP Menu News), Senate Committee on the Judiciary approval of Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights Act 2008 and surrounding debate (Law360), (Public Knowledge), (Ars Technica), (Wired), (Public Knowledge), (Ars Technica),… [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 2:19 pm
TechLawJournal has a thorough analysis of Justice John Paul Stevens’ opinions in technology-related areas. [read post]
31 Jul 2022, 5:53 am
One of the most important legislative responses to the Gilded Age was the passage of the Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890. [read post]
25 May 2015, 4:43 pm
On October 17, 2013, when Northern District of Illinois Judge Ronald Guzman entered a $2.46 billion judgment for the plaintiffs in the long-running Household International securities class action lawsuit, it was according to statements at the time the largest judgment ever in a securities fraud trial. [read post]
28 Sep 2007, 8:31 am
There was no upgrade involved.This was about when I left.I have heard later that the RIAA president Cary Sherman was denied by the judge to take the stands. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 10:07 am
Of course, this is why the lawsuit industry loves IARC evaluations, with its fallacies of semantical distortion.[5] Although identifying the causes of a jury verdict is more difficult than even determining carcinogenicity, Rosemary Pinto, one of plaintiff Kline’s lawyers, suggested that the exclusion of the IARC evaluation sank her case: “We’re very disappointed in the jury verdict, which we plan to appeal, based upon adverse rulings in advance of the trial that really… [read post]
20 May 2022, 2:44 pm
This week it decided another one: In re: Rail Freight Fuel Surcharge Antitrust Litigation. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 8:00 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 12:54 pm
[Readers: My last analysis (Question 197) related to post-employment restrictive covenants and the issue of whether those agreements transfer to a successor company in a merger. [read post]
