Search for: "In re Marks"
Results 981 - 1000
of 30,056
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 May 2021, 4:30 am
“They’re used throughout the WWF. [read post]
28 Jul 2012, 5:40 pm
House Judiciary Committee Marked Up the Adam Walsh Re-authorization Act (AWRA) (HR 3796) -and- the Edward Byrne... [read post]
10 May 2011, 2:25 am
" In re Gardenlife, Inc., Serial No. 77709903 (April 14, 2011) [not precedential].The Board found the marks to be substantially similar in appearance, identical in sound, suggestive of the same idea, and highly similar in commercial impression. [read post]
1 May 2023, 8:06 pm
In re: Stowman involves a boating accident and the application of maritime law. [read post]
3 Sep 2008, 6:25 pm
I wonder how Mark Shurtleff would have felt if the police had videotaped his prior act of vandalism for everyone to see.Selling favors to contributorsNow, Mark Shurtleff is running for re-election as Utah Attorney General. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 7:19 am
" In re Raven Marine, Inc., 217 USPQ 68, 70 (TTAB 1983), citing Pneutek, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 4:21 am
" In re Paramount Pictures Corp., 213 USPQ at 1112 (in this case, wording on a T-shirt “inherently tells the purchasing public the source of the T-shirt, not the source of the manufacturer but the secondary source. [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 3:41 am
In re Oak Park Brewing Company, Inc., Serial No. 86329948 (February 14, 2016) [not precedential].Material alteration: In an application under Section 1(b), an applicant may amend the drawing of the mark if "[t]he proposed amendment does not materially alter the mark. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 3:12 am
Trademark Examining Attorney Hanno Rittner issued refusals in two applications to register the mark shown below, comprising a background design of adjacent white and blue rectangles outlined in blue, for various communications and computer-related consultation services, on the ground that the applied-for mark fails to function as a service mark. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 2:34 am
On the other hand, even weak marks are entitled to protection. [read post]
18 May 2009, 12:00 am
" In re Shearer, Serial No. 78690531 (May 14, 2009) [not precedential].Applicant argued that the word "pussy" has multiple meanings, that nothing in the mark or in the packaging for the product suggests a vulgar meaning, and that the PTO did not establish how the mark would be perceived as scandalous in the marketplace.The Board, however, found that the PTO's evidence confirmed that "the attention-grabbing meaning is the only reasonable meaning to… [read post]
11 Apr 2007, 7:16 pm
In re Tyco Plastics Services AG, Serial No. 78431431 (March 29, 2007) [not precedential].The Board understandably found the goods to be similar, if not identical. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 3:19 am
" In re Mr. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 2:41 pm
The latest PIPEs Report also had a legal update written by some capable PIPE attorneys on the crazy Mark Cuban insider trading case that involves a PIPE. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 4:04 am
In re Strong Current, Ltd., Serial No. 86440263 (June 16, 2016) [not precedential].The Examining attorney relied on the similarity of the marks in sound and appearance. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 3:33 am
See In re Strategic Partners, Inc., 102 USPQ2d 1397 (TTAB 2012). [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 2:44 am
[Answer in first comment].In re I.L.L.A. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 2:37 am
So, to sum up, we're not back in Ithaca yet. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 3:24 am
November 3, 2016 - 10 AM: In re Orbit Irrigation Products, Inc., Serial Nos. 85945749 et al. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 1:19 am
Palm Bay, 73 USPQ2d at 1696 (quoting In re Pan Tex Hotel Corp., 190 USPQ 109, 110 (TTAB 1976)). [read post]
