Search for: "In re Michael B" Results 981 - 1000 of 2,374
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jul 2017, 11:33 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
 at 9.In mid-2014, Guerrero contacted BANA to resolve his delinquent loan and to re-apply for another loan modification. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 5:26 am by Jeff Gamso
  And it can be punished summarily.Back in 1962, in In re McConnell, the Supreme Court put it this way. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 6:00 am
  Judge Michael Daly Hawkins asked if that's the same as waived, and  Boutrous said it was. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 4:30 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: ACTA continues to be discussed and debated: (Michael Geist), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Public Knowledge),  (Techdirt), (Managing Intellectual Property), (Public Knowledge), (Public Knowledge), (Public Knowledge), Apotex challenge to Acular LS patent barred by res judicata: Roche Palo Alto & Allergan v… [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 1:00 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
Having resisted so well to the inventive step attacks and held its ground against the arguments on undue burden to produce anything within the claims, it was ultimately felled by Deputy Judge Michael Tappin QC in Saint-Gobain v 3M [2022] EWHC 1018 back in May because there was no dependent claim with a narrower range to save the independent claim whose range was too broad. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 11:39 pm by David Kopel
The co-authors are Nicholas Johnson (Fordham), Michael O’Shea (Oklahoma City), George Mocsary (Connecticut), and me.Below the fold is the full Table of Contents and Preface for the book. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 1:19 pm by Ingrid Wuerth
§ 1603(a), (b)(2), apparently qualifying as an agency or instrumentality because it is owned by the foreign state itself. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 1:17 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
 Bargaining: sometimes parties don’t show up to bargaining directly b/c they’d like to push issue to legislature or executive. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 5:53 am by Howard Knopf
CURRENT 2012 LEGISLATION RE “REVIEW”Review of Act92 Five years after the day on which this section comes into force and at the end of each subsequent period of five years, a committee of the Senate, of the House of Commons or of both Houses of Parliament is to be designated or established for the purpose of reviewing this Act.1997, c. 24, s. 50; 2012, c. 20, s. 58.The effective “coming into force” day for the purpose of this review is November 7, 2012… [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 5:53 am by Howard Knopf
CURRENT 2012 LEGISLATION RE “REVIEW”Review of Act92 Five years after the day on which this section comes into force and at the end of each subsequent period of five years, a committee of the Senate, of the House of Commons or of both Houses of Parliament is to be designated or established for the purpose of reviewing this Act.1997, c. 24, s. 50; 2012, c. 20, s. 58.The effective “coming into force” day for the purpose of this review is November 7, 2012… [read post]