Search for: "JJS"
Results 981 - 1000
of 1,755
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 May 2023, 3:00 am
., Kern, Oing, Scarpulla, Rodriguez, JJ. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
., LINDLEY, CURRAN, MONTOUR, AND OGDEN, JJ. 329 CA 22-00889 IN THE MATTER OF ARBITRATION BETWEEN COUNTY OF ONONDAGA, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, AND and CIVIL SERVICE EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION, INC., ONONDAGA COUNTY LOCAL 834, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
., Singh, González, Pitt-Burke, Rosado, JJ. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
., Scarpulla, Shulman, Higgitt, O'Neill Levy, JJ. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
., Scarpulla, Shulman, Higgitt, O'Neill Levy, JJ. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
., SMITH, CURRAN, MONTOUR, AND OGDEN, JJ. 994 TP 22-01050 THE MATTER OF KELLY PHILLIPS, PETITIONER, vNEW YORK STATE DIVISION OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND CITY OF ROCHESTER, RESPONDENTS. [read post]
24 May 2015, 2:09 pm
WALLACH and PETER TOM, JJ. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 5:08 am
., joined by Stevens, Ginsburg, and Breyer, JJ., dissenting). [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 1:32 pm
Madam Justice Abella wrote the majority judgement in Fraser, with Brown and Rowe JJ. writing together in dissent and Côté J., writing her own judgement in dissent. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 8:05 am
., and SCALIA and ALITO, JJ., joined, in which THOMAS, J., joined as to all but Part IV, and in which STEVENS, GINSBURG, BREYER, and SOTOMAYOR, JJ., joined as to Part IV. [read post]
28 Jul 2023, 6:43 am
Darrow JJ, Van de Wiele V, Beran D, Kesselheim AS. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 3:26 pm
But the concurring opinion for three Justices shows how this is really about the Democracy Canon: CAVANAGH, MARILYN KELLY, and HATHAWAY, JJ. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 3:15 pm
Klatt and Connor, JJ., concur. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 11:24 am
Norman Bishara, University of Michigan, Ross School of Business (nbishara@umich.edu); and JJ Prescott, University of Michigan Law School (jprescott@umich.edu). [read post]
18 Jun 2011, 12:12 am
S. 1328, 1329 (2007) (Stevens and KENNEDY, JJ., statement respecting denial of certiorari).I speculated that the reason the four Justices did not vote to grant certiorari (it only takes four votes to grant) is likely that, as Rule 10 suggests, the Justices rarely grant simply because of an erroneous decision of a state intermediate court of appeals; they generally wait until there is a disagreement among federal circuit courts of appeals or state supreme courts. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 10:23 am
., Kennedy, Thomas, & Alito, JJ. [read post]
21 May 2015, 3:21 pm
., ANGIOLILLO, BALKIN and CHAMBERS, JJ., concur. [read post]
10 Jul 2016, 8:01 am
Cir. 2013), a decision rendered after the underlying trial, the Circuit panel (Rogers, Pillard and Wilkins, JJ) found error solely as to Williams. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 12:56 pm
Sullivan and Rucker, JJ., concur. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 2:41 pm
., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Kennedy, Souter, Ginsburg, and Breyer, JJ., joined. [read post]