Search for: "JUSTICE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA" Results 981 - 1000 of 4,119
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Mar 2014, 4:28 am by Amy Howe
At more than twenty cents, Andrew Suszek criticizes what he describes as the “strong trend among journalists and judges alike in using the” Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 7:25 am by Nexsen Pruet
The opinion issued by the Supreme Court of the United States in that consolidated appeal is known as Brown v. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 6:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
United States: The procedural criminal law case asks the justices to decide “[w]hether a district court can enter a criminal forfeiture order when the time limit specified in the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure has already passed. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 12:46 pm by Larry
In this case, it comes from the Eleventh Circuit, with a special guest appearance from the Court of International Trade.The case is United States v. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 1:10 pm
Therefore, in interpreting and applying this Code section, the courts of this state may draw from the opinions ofthe United States Supreme Court in Daubert v. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 5:04 am by Amy Howe
United States comes from Mark Joseph Stern at Slate and Danielle Blevins of Talk Radio News Service. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 9:04 pm by Lyle Denniston
United States (12-158) returns to the Court. [read post]
26 Mar 2020, 5:56 pm by Francis Pileggi
LLC employees from continuing a whistleblower action over allegedly false Plavix blood thinner marketing because one of them dropped out, in United States of America, et al. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 12:10 am
  The only criteria was that an adult, one single adult, whose judgment in such matters is given near absolute deference though it's subject to no tests or challenge in anticipation or preparation for making such a decision, decided that it was a good idea.Imagine that, finding nothing hidden in undergarments or on the surface of your child's genitalia, your child was then subject to being probed and exposed in their genital cavities.Imagine that there was nothing, absolutely… [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 7:25 am by Michael O'Hear
Pollard (No. 10-1104), the United States Supreme Court held that employees of privately run federal prisons cannot be sued for money damages for violations of constitutional rights. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 7:19 am by Michael M. O'Hear
Pollard (No. 10-1104), the United States Supreme Court held that employees of privately run federal prisons cannot be sued for money damages for violations of constitutional rights. [read post]