Search for: "King v. United States Government" Results 981 - 1000 of 1,659
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Feb 2009, 3:07 am
In 1865, concerned for the welfare of his people in the face of a (then-termed) leprosy outbreak, King Kamehameha V passed into law an Act to Prevent the Spread of Leprosy. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 5:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
Thus, for example, Justice Thomas (in his concurrence in United States v. [read post]
2 May 2009, 7:51 am
If this kind of Islam grows and prospers in the United States - and this is already happening - it will not stay there. [read post]
25 Feb 2007, 9:09 pm
  All had learned their law in the age of Calhoun and nullification, when the subject "United States" still required a plural verb. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 11:39 am by Josh Blackman
To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes; In United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 12:48 am
United States, 17 F.3d 890, 901 (6th Cir. 1994); Albrecht v. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 5:10 am by SHG
  Used on a pro se criminal defendant in a court in the United States of America? [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm by John Dean
Two days later, the United States Supreme Court decided Roe v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 8:26 am by Lawrence Solum
One short year after publication, in 2010, Anti-Corruption Principle was relied upon by Justice Stevens in his Citizens United v. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 11:49 am by Jack Sharman
  As the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit said in United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 7:25 am
Thanks so much for sticking with us during this fascinating but definitely difficult period in the history of intellectual property governance. [read post]
16 Feb 2013, 10:43 am
I, III, IV and V could be changed and have the resulting entity still be worthy of the name "The Episcopal Church in the United States of America." [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 3:07 pm by Lyle Denniston
Hobby Lobby Stores); and in 2015 it upheld the availability of government subsidies for lower-income people seeking health insurance on all marketplaces or exchanges across the country (King v. [read post]