Search for: "LIGHTING & SUPPLIES, INC." Results 981 - 1000 of 1,128
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Nov 2009, 9:25 am by smtaber
— Toledo Blade, November 26, 2009 Sunoco Inc. has agreed to pay a $32,250 civil fine to the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency for deficiencies found at its Toledo Refinery during inspections in April, 2008. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 12:00 am
Budejovicky Budvar Narodni Podnik v Anheuser-Busch Inc (Class 46) (IPKat) EPO: Should green technology be subject to compulsory licensing? [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 10:08 am by John W. Arden
This was especially true in light of the franchisee's allegations that the market for the allegedly illegally tied supplies-hamburger buns and food-was competitive prior to the alleged tie. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 6:25 am
Medico (Filewrapper) BPAI finds claim indefinite and not directed to patentable subject under Bilski: Ex parte Hemmat (GRAY On Claims) District Court N D Illinois: KSR obviousness does not require prior art from the same field: Se-Kure Controls, Inc v Diam USA, Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Texas finds plaintiff has standing; agreement transfers ownership and simultaneously a conditional purchase by transferor from transferee: Balsam Coffee… [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 5:25 am
Medico (Filewrapper) BPAI finds claim indefinite and not directed to patentable subject under Bilski: Ex parte Hemmat (GRAY On Claims) District Court N D Illinois: KSR obviousness does not require prior art from the same field: Se-Kure Controls, Inc v Diam USA, Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Texas finds plaintiff has standing; agreement transfers ownership and simultaneously a conditional purchase by transferor from transferee: Balsam Coffee… [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 5:25 am
Medico (Filewrapper) BPAI finds claim indefinite and not directed to patentable subject under Bilski: Ex parte Hemmat (GRAY On Claims) District Court N D Illinois: KSR obviousness does not require prior art from the same field: Se-Kure Controls, Inc v Diam USA, Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Texas finds plaintiff has standing; agreement transfers ownership and simultaneously a conditional purchase by transferor from transferee: Balsam Coffee… [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 5:22 am
Dentsply International, Inc., CCH Advertising Law Guide ¶63,569. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 5:00 am
(ITC 337 Law Blog) What every transactional counsel should know – consequences of missing provisions in M&A documents: Carotek v Kobayashi Ventures; Gerber Scientific International v Satisloh (Property intangible) Troll Tracker suit settles after malice bar raised: Albritton v Cisco(Patent Baristas) (IPEG)(EDTexweblog.com) (The Prior Art) (IAM)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC construes term found in specification but not in the claims: Edwards Lifesciences LLC v… [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Bieffe USA, Inc., 35 F. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Bieffe USA, Inc., 35 F. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Bieffe USA, Inc., 35 F. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:00 am
Partnership for New York City, Inc., amicus curiae. [read post]
20 Sep 2009, 11:07 pm
See, e.g., MBO Labs., Inc. v. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 1:47 pm
(Lynn, MA; Robert Daigle, President) Applied Light Manufacturing, Inc. [read post]