Search for: "Levis v. Levis"
Results 981 - 1000
of 3,007
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2009, 4:22 am
SRAM Corp. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 9:05 pm
Mach Mining v. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 9:16 pm
Levi Family Partnership, LP v City of Los Angeles, 2015 WL 5918036 (CA App. 9/16/2015)Filed under: Current Caselaw, Senior Housing [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 5:28 am
(State v. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 10:09 pm
However, in the Levy v. [read post]
3 Oct 2008, 3:51 pm
Levy said it is too soon to say whether Toney will be retried.The responsibility of the state to provide exculpatory evidence to the defense was articulated in the 1963 Supreme Court ruling in Brady v. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 2:15 am
Off the top of his head, this Kat recalls these cases: Case C-467/08 Padawan (non-discriminatory 'fair compensation' through private recording levies); Case C‑569/08 Internetportal und Marketing GmbH v Richard Schlicht (abusive .eu domain name registration); Case C‑20/05 Pubblico Ministero v Karl Josef Wilhelm Schwibbert (copyright royalty collection, affixing of marks and technical standards); Case C-376/22 Pie Optiek v Bureau Gevers,… [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 6:00 am
Decided and Entered: February 08, 2024 Before: Manzanet-Daniels, J.P., Kern, Friedman, O'Neill Levy, Michael, JJ. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 6:00 am
Decided and Entered: February 08, 2024 Before: Manzanet-Daniels, J.P., Kern, Friedman, O'Neill Levy, Michael, JJ. [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 8:31 am
Corp. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 8:06 am
The case was Scott v. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 3:41 am
Private copying levy systems are not harmonised in the EU, and some Member States do not even collect levies or decided to get rid of them altogether. [read post]
7 May 2024, 7:43 am
Source: USPTO Rothschild moved to dismiss the complaint under the Second Circuit’s Rogers v. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 3:33 pm
., v. [read post]
6 Jun 2010, 7:51 pm
Nonetheless, the court opined that the argument did not withstand the foregoing logic and the express language of Maryland Rule 2-643 (c) which states, “Upon motion of the judgment debtor, the court may release some or all of the property from a levy if it finds that (1) the judgment has been vacated. . . . [read post]
10 May 2012, 11:58 am
Is Levi’s unreasonably vain? [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 2:14 am
Ian Boyko, Canadian Federation of Students Expand fair dealing in line with the case of CHH v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 7:16 am
Justice Clarence Thomas’s opinion for the Court Tuesday in Direct Marketing Association v. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 6:17 am
In Buczek v. [read post]
