Search for: "Light v. State Bar" Results 981 - 1000 of 4,943
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2011, 7:32 am by velvel
MASSEY COAL -- THAT BAR GOVERNMENTAL LEGAL DECISIONS FROM BEING MADE BY PERSONS WITH A FINANCIAL INTEREST IN THE DECISIONS.STATEMENT Lawrence R. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 9:02 am by Venkat
” To the extent he seeks to practice law in California, he is required to provide a copy of the opinion to the State Bar. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 8:22 am by Lyle Denniston
Rakoff in New York City in the case of Cedeno, et al., v. [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 1:15 am by INFORRM
The key conclusion which the Judge comes to is that the state of the law on this issue is currently ‘uncertain and in flux’, and so ‘probably requires the attention of an appellate court’ ([107]). [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 3:08 pm
That (incredibly light) sentence is fairly indicative of how the judge probably viewed the equities of this particular situation.Mr. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 4:16 pm by Stephen Bilkis
In the case at bar, the petitioner's nolo contendere plea constitutes the conviction and the fact that adjudication was withheld has no bearing on whether the Florida crime constitutes a conviction for purposes of SORA akin to People v Mitch and United States v Hardeman. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm by Marty Lederman
 In this post I’ll simply flag a couple of points that haven’t been sufficiently emphasized yet, or that warrant particular additional attention in light of the CRSCC’s arguments: Chase’s Argument was Focused on Judicial Removal of Officials Already in Office. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 4:39 am
  He found that Matot’s argument was “unpersuasive in light of” two decisions from the U.S. [read post]