Search for: "List v. Pennsylvania" Results 981 - 1000 of 1,809
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Sep 2014, 7:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
 FEDERAL COURT Eastern District Court of Pennsylvania Heebner v. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 6:28 am by Lorene Park
A district court in Pennsylvania found a reasonable basis for concluding that her discharge, ostensibly for turning in a requested email an hour late, was pretext for discrimination, given that none of the incidents described by the employer were mentioned in the letter, the employee’s previous discipline did not list discharge as the next step, and she had good reviews (Franzi v UPMC Presbyterian Shadyside). [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 7:10 am by Amy Howe
At CitiesSpeak, Lisa Soronen compiles a list of eight petitions on the Court’s certiorari docket that either involve or could affect local governments. [read post]
12 Sep 2014, 7:55 am by Joy Waltemath
A federal district court in Pennsylvania found a reasonable basis for concluding that her termination, ostensibly for turning in a requested email one hour and 16 minutes late, was a pretext for disability discrimination, given that none of the years’ worth of incidents described by the employer were mentioned, the employee’s previous discipline did not list termination as the next step, and she had good performance reviews. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 5:24 am
Yesterday, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals (jurisdiction covering Pennsylvania) issued a noteworthy precedential FMLA opinion in Budhun v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 7:40 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
In the Name of the Child: Race, Gender, and Economics in Adoptive Couple v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 7:40 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
In the Name of the Child: Race, Gender, and Economics in Adoptive Couple v. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 10:00 pm by Elizabeth A. Bokermann, Esquire
The Pennsylvania Superior Court recently decided a non-precedential high-conflict custody case in J.W.I. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 1:08 am
By Tuba Inal, University of Pennsylvania Press, 2013, 280 Pages, $75. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 10:00 pm by Elizabeth A. Bokermann, Esquire
 In other words, both parents should have a role in selecting the college that the child will attend, but that neither parent should deny the child the opportunity to attend a particular college on an unreasonable basis.In the recent Pennsylvania case, Mazurek v. [read post]