Search for: "Lloyd v. Lloyd" Results 981 - 1000 of 2,031
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The significance of this case should also be considered alongside the Court of Appeal’s judgment in another data protection-related claim, Richard Lloyd v Google LLC [2019] EWCA Civ 1599 (“Lloyd”) (see our summary of that decision here). [read post]
24 Nov 2008, 3:34 pm
Thanks to How Appealing, I saw this article in the latest issue of the Harvard Law Record headlined "Profs: District of Columbia v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 2:25 am by Richard Gunn
The judgment underscores the widely recognized appropriateness of the Lloyd’s Open Form (LOF) in situations of maritime risk. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 1:01 am
In a posts (here) and a follow-up (here) he's explored some of the implications of this story from the WindyPundit.The very short version: Back in 1982, and under the confidentiality promised by attorney-client privilege, Andrew Wilson confessed to his lawyers that while robbing a Chicago McDonald's he killed Lloyd Wycliffe with a shotgun. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 11:13 am
Kitchin LJ (¶ 28) suggests that the decision could be per incuriam, while Lloyd LJ (¶39) suggests that it is inconsistent with Agnew. [read post]
12 Aug 2018, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
On further appeal to the United Kingdom Supreme Court, Lord Lloyd-Jones, giving the judgment of the court, allowed the appeal and dismissed the claim. [read post]
15 May 2012, 3:38 am by Russ Bensing
The other decision was State v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 12:36 pm by Matt Cooper
Visitors can also find out whether Andrew Lloyd Webber’s “Phantom Song” unlawfully appropriated the melody of a folk tune (Repp v. [read post]
On 6 July 2011, the UKSC delivered its judgment in Scottish Widows plc v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland); Scottish Widows plc No 2 v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland); Scottish Widows plc v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland) [2011] UKSC 32. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 7:35 am
Pipo Bar & Rest., Inc. v Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's at London, 15 AD3d 556, 557 [2005]; Rickert v Travelers Ins. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 7:00 am by INFORRM
In response, Ofcom cited Lord Bridge in Lloyd v McMahon [1987] AC 625, 702, who said that “The so-called rules of natural justice are not engraved on tablets of stone… [W]hat the requirements of fairness demand when any body, domestic, administrative or judicial, has to make a decision which will affect the rights of individuals depends on the character of the decision-making body, the kind of decision it has to make and the statutory or other framework in which it… [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 12:08 am by INFORRM
Permission to appeal to the Supreme Court Ms Stocker sought permission to appeal to the Supreme Court – and on 9 July 2018 Lord Kerr, Lord Lloyd-Jones and Lord Briggs granted the permission to appeal the decision of the Court of Appeal to dismiss her appeal from the judgment of Mitting J. [read post]