Search for: "London v. State"
Results 981 - 1000
of 3,553
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Mar 2014, 4:34 am
Secretary of State for Home Department v MN & KY, heard 5 March 2014. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 1:05 am
U.K.'s Telegraph In cold blood: Why Israel's state thuggery must be stopped Agree? [read post]
4 May 2015, 1:00 am
Hotak v London Borough of Southwark; Johnson v Solihull; and Kanu v London Borough of Southwark, heard on 15 December 2014. [read post]
26 Apr 2015, 4:36 pm
London Borough of Harrow. [read post]
28 Apr 2019, 7:45 am
In Janssen v Teva (2009) the Federal Circuit stated that mere plausibility does not suffice to meet this requirement, if it did then patents could be obtained for little more than “respectable guesses”. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 9:30 pm
While there has been some studies of the case of R v Wewar, there has not been an investigation into the extent of the legal debates arising after this case. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
Some Food for Thought After Lee v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 7:55 am
The Supreme Court of Pakistan in the case titled Habib Ullah Energy Limited and another v. [read post]
8 May 2015, 7:00 am
Hotak v London Borough of Southwark; Johnson v Solihull; and Kanu v London Borough of Southwark, heard on 15 December 2014. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 7:03 am
New London, which upheld the city of New London's seizure of private land for development. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 7:12 am
Some are covered by their states' Guaranty Fund, but some aren't. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 1:27 pm
The first Virginia case after the landmark U.S. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 11:00 am
(Americas Migration Brief, June 2023) [text]Case in Brief: Canadian Council for Refugees v. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 2:26 am
West London Mental Health NHS Trust v Chhabra, heard 29 October 2013. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 11:19 am
UO v London Borough of Redbridge (2023) EWHC 1355 (Admin) Ms UO and her 3 children, aged 11, 5 and 3, were homeless and had applied to LB Redbridge. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 1:59 am
R (on the application of Afzal) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 7th June 2023. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 9:55 pm
(Both Jan Luba QC for Doherty and Philip Sales QC for the Secretary of State challenged this point and it was not uniformly accepted - see below). [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 10:06 pm
They searched under the authority of a warrant which turned out to be unlawful - see Redknapp v City of London Police Unfortunately, the Redknapp case suggests that the warrant was granted far too readily by the court which surely ought to be a rather more robust "guardian of the gates" in these matters. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 3:01 am
New York State Urban Dev. [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 11:53 am
That was the case in the coverage action between football helmet manufacturer Riddell and its liability insurers, which is pending in California state court, where certain London Market Insurers tried to require the production of extensive discovery before that substantially identical production took place in the underlying product liability action. [read post]
