Search for: "Long v. Long"
Results 981 - 1000
of 66,296
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Dec 2014, 6:30 am
Here is the abstract: In granting cert in Young v. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 9:32 am
My favorite example is the mockable claim in Reno v. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 4:00 am
.* See Matter of Fernandez v New York City Tr. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 4:00 am
.* See Matter of Fernandez v New York City Tr. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 9:24 am
Casey, it reaffirmed much of Roe v. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 11:40 am
As a special Thanksgiving treat for those of us on the plaintiffs' side, take a look at Lubin v. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 10:09 am
See United States v. [read post]
3 May 2021, 10:19 am
Some cases go undecided for as long as 7 yearsThe 3rd District Court of Appeal in Sacramento is one of the busiest courthouses in California. [read post]
22 Jan 2017, 2:06 pm
There can be several different methods to prove a case under Marvin v Marvin case law. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 8:28 am
So at long last, the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals finally rendered a decision in the appeal of Hadden v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 8:15 am
In Harris Trust & Savings Bank v. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 7:15 am
That may well save time in the long run. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 5:00 am
The opinion in Dukes v. [read post]
12 Sep 2024, 7:21 am
Raimondo, et al., the Supreme Court overturned the Chevron deference doctrine, a long-standing tenet of administrative law established in 1984 in Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 1:12 pm
Long Island Railroad torts case. [read post]
19 Sep 2024, 6:50 am
Raimondo, et al., the Supreme Court overturned the Chevron deference doctrine, a long-standing tenet of administrative law established in 1984 in Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2007, 10:22 pm
The Supreme Court has held that home healthcare workers are not entitled to overtime pay (Long Island Care at Home, Ltd. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2009, 9:28 am
Rivers v. [read post]
24 Sep 2023, 11:00 pm
# # #DECISIONC. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 4:28 am
Research Automation, Inc. v. [read post]